Analyses are solely the work of the authors and have not been edited or endorsed by GLG.
P.A. in an Endocrinology Practice
February 9, 2009
Quality of Diabetes Care in Family Medicine Practices: Influence of Nurse-Practitioners and Physician’s Assistants | www.annfammed.org
From my experience, Physicians Assistants have a closer relationship with the patient and are much more knowledgable about medical technology. After the P.A. left my doctor's practice and was not replaced, I am considering looking for another doctor.
The Goal Is (And Should Be) 100%
January 23, 2009
Journal of the American College of Cardiology - | content.onlinejacc.org
All devices in patients with biventricular pacemakers are programmed for 100% left ventricular pacing. In the study by B. Koplan and colleagues, patients who were biventricularly paced over 92% of time [75% of all patients] derived a greater benefit than the other [25% of] patients. The salient points are that most patients are biventricularly paced over 92% of the time. The causes for less biventricular pacing were dislodgement of left ventricular lead, atrial arrhythmia and specific setting of the pacemaker called ventricular rate regulation, which allows the pacing in the presence of rapid atrial arrhythmia. This study provides some insight in the ways that biventricular pacing improves the condition of patients with heart failure, but it is not definitive.
January 2, 2009
Lipitor may indeed be better than Simvasatain, but an observational study will NOT prove this.
January 2, 2009
Generic Heart Drugs as Good as Brand-Name Counterparts | www.washingtonpost.com
Please see my comments on the ALLHAT Hypertension study. Newer is not better. The biggest difference from my standpoint is formulation to keep the patent runing. In hard economic times we really need to consider this for the patient and NOT BIG pharma.
Rosuvastatin in CV risk reduction
December 28, 2008
CRESTOR Demonstrates Dramatic CV Risk Reduction in a Large Statin Outcomes Study | www.astrazeneca.com
Crestor, Rosuvastatin, Cardiovascular risk
December 15, 2008
Retrospective studies should be viewed with caution. Most retrospective studies which may contain a bias in the prescribed treatment should be anlysed with matched propencity score. To confirm the results a randomized trial would essentially be needed.
Important Revelation with no Sequences.
December 10, 2008
Generic Heart Drugs as Good as Brand-Name Counterparts | www.washingtonpost.com
No doubt generic and brand-name drugs are the same or almost the same not only in cardiovascular medicine, but in majority of other applications as well. It is not a surprise: companies are not going to study generic drugs in search of new benefits. There are some advantages, however, of brand-name drugs, such as extended release formulation, or immediate release package or absence of certain side effects, for example.
If it seems too good to be true...it probably is.
December 9, 2008
Generic Heart Drugs as Good as Brand-Name Counterparts | www.washingtonpost.com
This article implies that physician's have no justifiable reason for prescribing brand-name drugs. Unfortunately, it's not that simple.
December 8, 2008
There is a question of bias in this study. It is not prospective, not randomized and not blinded and thus no valid conclusions can be made. The study should be ignored. It will have no impact on sales.
December 8, 2008
Generic Heart Drugs as Good as Brand-Name Counterparts | www.washingtonpost.com
While most doctors in the past recommended brand-name medications for many reasons, the shift is more towards generic medications.
Zetia Now Off Best Practices List for MI Prevention, But is Niaspan > Diet?
November 15, 2009
Percutaneous valve repair – next battle among cardiovascular device companies?
October 4, 2009
MADIT CRT Will Increase Use of CRT Defibrillators
September 2, 2009
Dibigatran will change how we manage atrial fibrillation
August 31, 2009
Finally an alternative to Warfarin for patients with Atrial Fibrillation
August 31, 2009