Council Members in this Study Group: 31
This study group may include professors, attorneys, former regulatory officers, and consultants knowledgeable on topics such as law and litigation issues, lobbying, policy and government, elections, antitrust, immigration, intellectual property, and legislation, among others.
Leading institutions connect with members of this Study Group through GLG
Rechtsanwalt/Partner (Attorney at Law, Germany)
OSBORNE CLARKE O W A![]()
Thomas Funke is a Rechtsanwalt (Attorney at Law, Germany) and Partner at Osborne Clarke. Dr. Funke advises on German and European antitrust, competition law, as well as the laws impacting the various regulated industries (utilities, telecoms, and the...
Peter StylesPrincipal Consultant
Stratos European Policy Limited![]()
Peter Styles is the principal consultant at Stratos European Policy in England, where he offers analytical and related consulting services to business clients with an interest in European Union policy development and regulation. He follows broad trends...
Stefan BretthauerPartner
Heuking Kühn Lüer Wojtek![]()
Stefan Bretthauer is a partner at Heuking Kühn Lüer Wojtek in Hamburg, Germany. Mr. Bretthauer specializes in antitrust law, including distribution law; hospitals mergers, energy law, and franchise law. He has worked in the antitrust department of a major...
Opinions and analyses expressed in GLG News are solely those of the author. See the Terms of Use for details.
The European Commission may struggle to reflect national views on financial sector regulation
May 1, 2009
Industry attacks draft EU hedge-fund bill | www.euractiv.com
The largest EU Member States, represented directly in the G7 and/or the G20, have given the European Commission a clear mandate to propose new regulatory controls over alternative investment managers operating inside the EU. Mostly affected will be hedge, private equity and venture capital funds above a threshold size. While the Commission has produced quite clear proposals (albeit criticised from many quarters), once the new European Parliament has been elected and once the Swedish Presidency of the EU Council gets started, we will witness a battle royal among Member State governments to influence the precise legislative outcome
Green certificates would gain value if flat rate feed-in tariffs were phased out
April 10, 2008
Incentives to Invest in Electricity Production from Renewable Energy under Different Support Schemes | www.arrhenius.de
There is another flaw in the Arrhenius argument, not mentioned in peer reviews dealing with the distinction between wholesale power market spot and future prices. The Arrhenius authors appear to assume that green certificates would be issued or required on top of the German feed-in tariff regime, rather than as an eventual complete replacement for it. Instead, any reasonable assumptions, about reform of the German regime and EU harmonisation of means of support according to market based principles, would suggest that a quota scheme should eventually replace flat rate feed-in tariffs. Enhanced value for investors could then come not from overly generous guaranteed payments but from their meeting the marginal need for certificates, valid EU wide, in those countries or on the part of those suppliers who become most "short".
Energy shake-up or just reshuffling regulatory competences?
January 11, 2007
EU readies for battle over energy markets | www.ft.com
European Commission energy review: Any short term impact?
January 5, 2007
Report to end doubts on EU energy competition | www.ft.com
The European Commission will publish a package of findings and possible new measures related to the power and gas sectors on 10 January.
The work of DG COMP and DG TREN on their analyses has been closely coordinated.
Anti-trust actions, or threats of action, combined with proposals to introduce a third package of EU internal energy market legislation, may precipitate far reaching industry restructuring.