Council Members in this Study Group: 11
This study group may include physicians, care providers, and researchers specializing in internal medicine, cardiology, oncology, dermatology, emergency medicine, family medicine, neurology, obstetrics-gynecology, psychiatry, radiology, nursing, optometry, genetics, and mental health. It may also include experts knowledgeable on diagnostic labs, disease management, medical devices, long term care, surgery centers, health management, pharma, and biotechnology, among others.
Leading institutions connect with members of this Study Group through GLG
Eric GruffPrincipal
E4 Consulting![]()
Eric Gruff, PhD, MBA, BS, is Founder of E4 Consulting, which specializes in pharmaceutical development, regulatory affairs, and project and portfolio management. Dr. Gruff has over 17 years of experience in the pharmaceutical and biotech sector, including...
Adjunct Professor
THE UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND![]()
Evan Siegel, M Phil, Ph D, is the President and Chief Executive Officer of Ground Zero Pharmaceuticals, a regulatory affairs and product development consulting firm in California, since June 1999. Dr. Siegel is also an Adjunct Professor at the University...
Opinions and analyses expressed in GLG News are solely those of the author. See the Terms of Use for details.
Risk/Benefit is the Answer, Even More Now
December 22, 2008
Tysabri - Multiple Sclerosis patient with progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy has died | www.msrc.co.uk
1. In general, the more pharmacologically potent a therapy, the more the possibllity that adverse experiences will be seen. 2. Risk/Beneift is a critical consideration, even for products intented for serious or life-threatening disease. It is incumbent upon both the FDA and the physician community to realistically assess preclnical and clinical data during the review and approval process. 3. Patients must be fully and competently informed of the risks and benefits of such therapies and have the right to decide for themselves whether or not to participate in clinical trials and therapeutic treatment with marketed products. 4. No therapeutic regimen is risk-free and society needs to understand and embrace this fact.
Link to Pancreatitis is Bound to Negatively Impact Byetta Sales
August 21, 2008
FDA Alert: Hemorrhagic or Necrotizing Pancreatitis in Patients Taking Byetta | www.fda.gov
The recent publication of new cases of pancreatitis that are occurring in patients taking Byetta (exenatide) can't be good for Amylin/Lilly. While Byetta and investigational GLP-1 analogs are still very viable therapeutics for Type 2 Diabetes, prescribers will have to reassess the risk-benefit ratio for many patients given the new information. The long-acting form of Byetta (LAR) may suffer the most since its long half-life will make reversal of pancreatitis that much more difficult and may lead to additional damage.
A Complex Personal and Societal Issue
July 17, 2008
Costly Cancer Drug Offers Hope, but Also a Dilemma | www.nytimes.com
The issues associated with expensive therapeutics are multifaceted and involve personal, professional and societal components. Value related to medical treatment is uniquely assessed by each individual with respect to his/her financial burden, overall lifestyle and quality of life, societal role, and belief structure. Society itself is beset with contrary stakeholders in the insurance, governmental, medical and belief-centered establishments. This article is important in that it lays out some fundamental questions that wealthy countries face with respect to cost vs. benefit for new therapies in an environment relatively little constrained by cost-containment in the medical arena.
July 8, 2008
Drug Makers Say FDA Safety Focus Is Slowing New-Medicine Pipeline | online.wsj.com
1. Sponsors need to be "squeaky clean" with respect to their assessment of signals of toxicity in drug develpment programs. 2. This assessment should be made at the preclinical and early clinical stages of the process, irrespective of political and financial considerations. 3. The per cent of failures in Phase 2 and 3 will be higher unless programs are honestly and thoroughly assessed according to the above. Even so, there will likely be more failures in late-stage programs as clinical data are generated. The FDA will spend more time and effort on safety assessment to avoid large populations being exposed in the marketing environment to new drugs.
Tainted Heparin Will Mean More Scrutiny of Drug Manufacturers
April 21, 2008
UPDATE: FDA Head Sees Economic Fraud Behind Tainted Heparin | www.reuters.com
Regardless of the reason (greed, carelessness, incompetence, etc.) that Chinese heparin became tainted, the end result will be increased scrutiny on imported raw materials and other ingredients, not only from China, but from all 3rd World suppliers. How the FDA and other regulatory agencies actually intend to step up the scrutiny is still open to debate, but the ultimate responsibility lies with the license holder.
October 26, 2006 | Palo Alto
GLGi: New Drug Application ProcessLeading Experts in Charles River Labs Toxicology Services Users have not participated in any GLG webcasts.