November 28, 2006
Without Relief, The Accounting Profession Will find It Hard To Embrace Standard Harmonization
Analysis of:
Booming Audit Firms Seek Shield From Suits | online.wsj.com
This analysis is solely the work of the author. It has not been edited or endorsed by GLG.
Implications: 1. The US accounting profession is attempting to harmonize US GAAP with IFRS.
2. The US accounting profession finds it hard to embrace some harmonization principles because of the US legal environment.
Analysis: FASB and the IASB are attempting to harmonize global accounting standards. Investors would love to have consistent standards used in all major markets.
In principle, both US GAAP and IFRS are focused on value. The primary goal of both sets of standards is to inform investors about value creation. However US standards recognize the litigious nature of US society. FASB adapts this value perspective by adjusting its loss function. US GAAP has an inherent bias to under stating value rather than over stating value (e.g., lower-of-cost-or-market). US accountants realize that investors sue more for over pricing than under pricing. Thus FASB is having a harder time, versus IASB, embracing current value accounting. US accountants conveniently call this conservatism.
Accountants do need legal relief, like doctors. Without such relief, US accountants will cling to their historical cost standards. US accountants will find it difficult to embrace current value standards.
2. The US accounting profession finds it hard to embrace some harmonization principles because of the US legal environment.
Analysis: FASB and the IASB are attempting to harmonize global accounting standards. Investors would love to have consistent standards used in all major markets.
In principle, both US GAAP and IFRS are focused on value. The primary goal of both sets of standards is to inform investors about value creation. However US standards recognize the litigious nature of US society. FASB adapts this value perspective by adjusting its loss function. US GAAP has an inherent bias to under stating value rather than over stating value (e.g., lower-of-cost-or-market). US accountants realize that investors sue more for over pricing than under pricing. Thus FASB is having a harder time, versus IASB, embracing current value accounting. US accountants conveniently call this conservatism.
Accountants do need legal relief, like doctors. Without such relief, US accountants will cling to their historical cost standards. US accountants will find it difficult to embrace current value standards.
Report a Concern
More GLG News in
Accounting & Financial Analysis
Most Popular:
Source Article | Expert Analyses
End of the Tourism Boom?
abcnews.go.com
Could Bank Rules Break The Fair Value Debate
www.cfo.com
ABA Levels New Blast at Fair Value
www.cfo.com
Derivatives:Giving Credit Where It is Due
www.economist.com
Effects of End of Tourism Boom on other sectors
November 24, 2008
The Future of Fair Value Accounting and Mark to Market (FASB 157)
November 19, 2008
What is the 2008 outlook for homebuilding?
January 14, 2008
Global Warming is not a myth, but a reality
December 26, 2007
Outsourcing - What keeps it going - The pro's, con's and future
July 9, 2007

