September 3, 2007
Why the Fed's Help Won't Help
Analysis of:
Inside the Countrywide Lending Spree | www.nytimes.com
This analysis is solely the work of the author. It has not been edited or endorsed by GLG.
Implications: It is wonderful that President Bush's plan to help the disenfranchised keep their homes, and in some (albeit, few) cases, this program will work. But like the cut in the commercial lending rates, this is more symbolic than helpful, and the true problems will persist after the assistance package is complete.
Analysis: On August 30th, President Bush called for limited help from Congress to to assist in the 'soft-landing' of the eminent foreclosure crisis that is rearing its ugly-head. The relaxing of some FHA underwriting standards, along with the urging of lenders to forego future profits to save their deteriorating Balance Sheets will no doubt be of some assistance. Unfortunately, the truth of the matter, which no one on Capitol Hill seems to either want to address or is willing to address, is the fact that many of these loans were made to people who either could not document their income, or grossly overstated what they actually earned. As such, neither Fannie, Freddie, or the FHA can or will be able to help: the estimated market for these mortgages range anywhere from $250B to $750B in originations. This figure is staggering, and evidence of the systemic issue that we, as lenders and consumers, created.
The proposed assistance package would only be useful for those who can document their income: with the restructuring of 2-/3-yr ARMS into fixed rate mortgages, the burden of proof for documentation is needed by the borrower, which will not be forthcoming. The secondary market, which readily feasted on issue-upon-issue of MBS securities market for the Alt-A products are no longer available: the restructuring of the existing securities IS ESSENTIAL to this plan. Without it, all that's left is the goodwill of the White House trying to put a band-aid on a major head-wound.
A workable solution would be the repackaging of the existing securities, with the implicit support of the US Treasury in the form of a surety-wrap bought by the guilty parties who are looking for some form of bailout (e.g. Countrywide, Washington Mutual, Wells-Fargo). While this plan would certain erode the institutions' profit margins by increased investment costs, the long run would definitely be beneficial by the reduced amount of foreclosures and delinquencies.
Analysis: On August 30th, President Bush called for limited help from Congress to to assist in the 'soft-landing' of the eminent foreclosure crisis that is rearing its ugly-head. The relaxing of some FHA underwriting standards, along with the urging of lenders to forego future profits to save their deteriorating Balance Sheets will no doubt be of some assistance. Unfortunately, the truth of the matter, which no one on Capitol Hill seems to either want to address or is willing to address, is the fact that many of these loans were made to people who either could not document their income, or grossly overstated what they actually earned. As such, neither Fannie, Freddie, or the FHA can or will be able to help: the estimated market for these mortgages range anywhere from $250B to $750B in originations. This figure is staggering, and evidence of the systemic issue that we, as lenders and consumers, created.
The proposed assistance package would only be useful for those who can document their income: with the restructuring of 2-/3-yr ARMS into fixed rate mortgages, the burden of proof for documentation is needed by the borrower, which will not be forthcoming. The secondary market, which readily feasted on issue-upon-issue of MBS securities market for the Alt-A products are no longer available: the restructuring of the existing securities IS ESSENTIAL to this plan. Without it, all that's left is the goodwill of the White House trying to put a band-aid on a major head-wound.
A workable solution would be the repackaging of the existing securities, with the implicit support of the US Treasury in the form of a surety-wrap bought by the guilty parties who are looking for some form of bailout (e.g. Countrywide, Washington Mutual, Wells-Fargo). While this plan would certain erode the institutions' profit margins by increased investment costs, the long run would definitely be beneficial by the reduced amount of foreclosures and delinquencies.
Report a Concern
More GLG News in
Financial & Business Services
Most Popular:
Source Article | Expert Analyses
The Trickle-Up Bailout
www.washingtonpost.com
Apple falls on consumer spending fears
www.ft.com
Residential Mortgage Appraisal Should Consider Income Approach
Aberdeen in tie-up with MUFG
www.ft.com
Pension funds cannot escape financial crisis
www.iol.co.za
Proposal: Use of $700B Bailut Funds
October 7, 2008
$700 Billion Bailout Attacks The Symptoms Not The Cause
October 3, 2008
Apple is Positioned for the Future!
October 3, 2008
Blame the models and Risk Based Pricing
September 30, 2008
Don't Blame the Models
September 29, 2008

