March 19, 2008
WSJ Sensationalizes Routine Mall Conflicts
Analysis of:
Score One for Challenger In Phoenix's Mall Bout | online.wsj.com
This analysis is solely the work of the author. It has not been edited or endorsed by GLG.
Implications: WSJ writes a feature article about an event that has zero significance out side of the Phoenix mall development community. While it may be of interest to those curious few who care about routine struggles between real estate developers of every type, size and description, it is really of no consequence to the larger business community. It must have been a slow news day at the business desk. All that really happened was that one very wealthy and influential mixed use developer managed to outmaneuver another wealthy and influential mixed use developer for the rights to build a regional shopping center complex on the far north side of Phoenix. Actually, by WSJ's own admission, it wasn't even new news. The real news had happened several months ago when one developer gained a commitment from Nordstrom's which virtually guaranteed that Bloomingdales would follow suit. The article was all about Bloomingdale's new commitment which was actually a nonevent.
Analysis: The most important single fact about regional mall development has always been, is now and will always be, the question of "who can sign up the dominant anchor store first"?
Once that is determined the rest of the development process becomes a routine process of putting the rest of the pieces together. The only real risk of competition a developer faces after signing the dominant anchor, is the possibility that some of the less desirable anchor stores that were not able to get into the first development could ban together and create a second development.
In past years when there was an excess of department stores jockeying for position in the major metros, it happened with some frequency. That is where the "B & C' malls come from! However there simply are no longer an excess of department stores so that whomever signs the dominant player automatically gets the second & third ranked stores.
The only thing that was different about this situation in Phoenix was the fact that the dominant local developer who has built 11 of the 12 malls, was finessed by a New York developer who has never built a single thing in Phoenix. I am quite sure that Macerich, who recently bought the local mall developer, is feeling pretty silly right now to let a stranger pull this kind of trick right in their own backyard.
Analysis: The most important single fact about regional mall development has always been, is now and will always be, the question of "who can sign up the dominant anchor store first"?
Once that is determined the rest of the development process becomes a routine process of putting the rest of the pieces together. The only real risk of competition a developer faces after signing the dominant anchor, is the possibility that some of the less desirable anchor stores that were not able to get into the first development could ban together and create a second development.
In past years when there was an excess of department stores jockeying for position in the major metros, it happened with some frequency. That is where the "B & C' malls come from! However there simply are no longer an excess of department stores so that whomever signs the dominant player automatically gets the second & third ranked stores.
The only thing that was different about this situation in Phoenix was the fact that the dominant local developer who has built 11 of the 12 malls, was finessed by a New York developer who has never built a single thing in Phoenix. I am quite sure that Macerich, who recently bought the local mall developer, is feeling pretty silly right now to let a stranger pull this kind of trick right in their own backyard.
Report a Concern
More GLG News in
Real Estate
Most Popular:
Source Article | Expert Analyses
Some Fear Commercial Property Loans Will Be Next Stage in Downturn
www.nytimes.com
July Existing-Home Sales Show Gain
www.realtor.org
Cash Flow More Volatile but Still Stable: Fitch CMBS Study
www.cpnonline.com
An Economy on the Brink
www.usnews.com
EMPLOYMENT: Open season for jobs
www.lvrj.com
When data is vague or inconclusive, look at the real world
August 28, 2008
The other side of the coin
August 28, 2008
FINANCIALS SHOT IN THE FOOT
August 26, 2008
Once again the major rating agencies are getting it wrong
August 20, 2008
LAS VEGAS: REAL ESTATE RECOVERY UNDERWAY?
August 19, 2008

