Summary
1. In “allocating the D-Block spectrum directly to public safety organizations on a state, local and regional basis,” it becomes strictly a governmental network. 2. It seems logical that Verizon would not want to have its competitors possibly having control of such attractive spectrum. 3. Verizon certainly comes up with effective rhetoric that this idea is totally based on community interests: "bold action" was necessary to overcome the inertia of creating an interoperable network for public safety.”
Analysis
With the "public safety...free to select the commercial partner or partners of their choice, using an RFP process or similar competitive approach to best meet their individual needs,” Verizon believes it has a better shot at getting some business. Also, it would not have to shell out a tremendous amount of money for the spectrum. “Public safety organizations would be able to leverage existing network infrastructure and investments and thereby save money.” Of course, that is where Verizon enters the scene. The focus on “interoperability” also fits in with Verizon’s supposed push for open networks – resulting in consistency with its entire marketing message.
Verizon may also be trying to win brownie points with certain FCC commissioners that are likely to have reservations about an auction. These concerns seem to center around the struggling economy and the ability of private companies to finance the network. Michael Copps has expressed ambivalent feelings. It may be the case that the new chairman may also develop doubts about the merits of an auction.
