April 9, 2007
Verigy CEO stays on message, but avoids key trend.
Analysis of:
Testing strategies for the long haul: Verigy’s Barnes on semiconductor test. | www.reed-electronics.com
This analysis is solely the work of the author. It has not been edited or endorsed by GLG.
Implications: Keith Barnes expounds on the advantages of the single, scalable platform, but in talking about how Verigy continues to drive down the cost of test misses the key factor causing tester price compression.
Analysis: The most expensive part of ATE test equipment by function is the digital subsystem, both in terms of vendor COGS and customer price. This cost has been driven down principally by reduced external testing requirements from new chip designs, effected by combinations of built in self test (BIST) and design for manufacturing techniques - resulting in a "commodity" 200MHz digital pin being offered by every ATE vendor for their test platforms that can satisfy those reduced requirements. The higher level of integration that Keith mentions is cost advantageous for large devices, or for testing multiple devices in parallel, but not all mixed signal devices lend themselves to high levels of parallel test. Smaller numbers of instruments per card that allow more focused configurations and cheap digital pins are more effective at lowering cost for these devices. Examples of these are wireless (especially those including RF) and consumer devices.
Analysis: The most expensive part of ATE test equipment by function is the digital subsystem, both in terms of vendor COGS and customer price. This cost has been driven down principally by reduced external testing requirements from new chip designs, effected by combinations of built in self test (BIST) and design for manufacturing techniques - resulting in a "commodity" 200MHz digital pin being offered by every ATE vendor for their test platforms that can satisfy those reduced requirements. The higher level of integration that Keith mentions is cost advantageous for large devices, or for testing multiple devices in parallel, but not all mixed signal devices lend themselves to high levels of parallel test. Smaller numbers of instruments per card that allow more focused configurations and cheap digital pins are more effective at lowering cost for these devices. Examples of these are wireless (especially those including RF) and consumer devices.
Report a Concern
More GLG News in
Technology, Media & Telecom
Most Popular:
Source Article | Expert Analyses
Why Apple Should Buy Dell
lowendmac.com
Virtualization's Pain Points
www.forbes.com
BlackBerry maker battles back
money.cnn.com
No spectrum shortage: DoT
www.business-standard.com
Fate of BCE Buyout in Doubt
online.wsj.com
Spectrum fragmentation and competition - the Indian misconception
November 27, 2008
What VCs Should Invest In ... In this Economy
November 24, 2008
TV Numbers Are Not That Good
November 21, 2008
TV Numbers Aren't Good - But Don't Rule Out The Power Of The Consumer
November 20, 2008
A Note on Consumer Behaviour with an eye on Experience in Africa
November 20, 2008

