Subscribe to Updates in Accounting & Financial Analysis

RSS By Email

RSS By RSS

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Subscribe in Bloglines


The Expertise Imperative and Compliance Technology
Access to a diverse array of specialized expert inputs drives superior decisions in every organizational context: within corporations, by investors and consultancies, and within nonprofits. When decision makers are confident of their decision inputs, they can respond more quickly and creatively to challenges and opportunities.Learn more about GLG's Compliance Framework


This page may include content provided by Council Members, your access to which is subject to the Terms of Use.
Find Out More

March 8, 2007

US GAAP: A Foreseeable Death

Analysis of: One Accounting Standard for All? | www.cfo.com
This analysis is solely the work of the author. It has not been edited or endorsed by GLG.
Analysis By:
Ronald Kiima, CPA, President Ronald Kiima, CPA
President , Kiima Incorporated
Implications: This article raises the question as to whether the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) will ultimately mandate that domestic public companies report their financial results pursuant to International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”).  I believe, as a former SEC Assistant Chief Accountant who had oversight responsibility for numerous foreign private issuers, that the answer is an unequivocal “yes.” 

Analysis:

For approximately two decades, the SEC and Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) have been diligently working with their respective counterparts abroad to converge U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP) with the generally accepted accounting principles of other first-world countries.  This ongoing sovereignty -surrendering, give and take exercise currently targets substantial convergence by 2009.  The SEC has increasingly made it known for years, under both Democratic and Republican administrations, that upon reaching substantial convergence, if not somewhat before, that it will progressively eliminate the current requirement that foreign private issuers provide detailed footnote disclosures reconciling any material differences with U.S. GAAP…thus, the “political carrot.” 


With respect to the question posed by this article as to whether U.S. public companies will be allowed to continue to report under U.S. GAAP subsequent to substantial convergence with IFRS, again targeted for on or before 2009, I believe that U.S. GAAP will remain a reporting option but only for a period of time sufficient for the regulatory, investing and academic communities to become more comfortable with IFRS.  However, time is of the essence for these communities as I believe that the SEC views us as being well into the transitional period.  Furthermore, I believe that the SEC, regardless of the political persuasions of the then President and SEC Chairman, will continue to aggressively push such transition so as to ultimately mandate IFRS for all U.S. listed companies, foreign and domestic.  Thus, the death of U.S. GAAP is foreseeable!       



Report a Concern

GLG News: What Experts Think Is Important





Analytics


Generated at 2008-09-07T01:45:17.680