October 26, 2007
Tommy Hilfiger Big Winner in Macy's Deal
Analysis: You have to give Macy’s credit for wanting to get an exclusive on designer apparel brands. But if the Tommy Hilfiger deal doesn’t bring more exclusive deals to Macy’s, it might not be worth the amount of space devoted to it.
Let’s face it Tommy Hilfiger isn’t the growth brand it used to be. Even Lungren admits the brand has had it ups and downs commenting in the New York Times “Tommy is very significant brand. [B]ut, Hilfiger has lost ground over recent years, going from preppy to urban and back again.” Such ups and downs is one reason why the brand has lost both position and space in many department stores.
Just what this deal means in terms of sales isn’t clear. If Macy’s devotes more space to Hilfiger, it may cause other, more profitable brands to lose sales. A case can be made that Macy’s will get a larger piece of a declining brands market share, a strategy that has proven to be a recipe for disaster.
The only clear winner in this deal is Tommy Hilfiger which gets high profile exposure in 850 Macy’s stores and keeps its lucrative free standing stores, online sales, and licensees business.
Report a Concern
More GLG News in
Consumer Goods & Services
What’s Not Selling at Saks
blogs.wsj.com
Zale Corporation Says Does Not Believe That Previously Issued Earnings Outlook Should Be Relied Upon
www.reuters.com
Whatever you do, don't buy Sears
money.cnn.com
Report: GM Is Considering Selling SAAB, Pontiac, Saturn Brands
blogs.wsj.com
Wine and Liquor Keep Flowing Despite Sour Economy
www.usnews.com
Is Pontiac Going To Join Oldsmobile In GM's Scrapyard?
December 1, 2008
Zale Disappoints Again, Again, and Again!
November 27, 2008
Luxury Retailers may be a solid long term play
November 19, 2008
Luxury Names Trade Brand Value for Cashflow
November 19, 2008
To Survive, Saks Needs To Respond To Market Challenges
November 19, 2008

