August 19, 2008
THE MACAU ECONOMY HAS BEEN EXCELLENT - WHY PUT A DAMPER ON GOOD TIMES??
Analysis of:
TRYING TIMES LOOM FOR SANDS IN MACAU | www.lvrj.com
This analysis is solely the work of the author. It has not been edited or endorsed by GLG.
Implications: Is it my imagination or does China not have both oars in the water? Why try and curtail the profit structure of a very viable industry serving their country well? It's time that the policies of China work to help industry rather than hamper it. Hard to figure their motives...
Analysis: So the Sands people said things in court in the U.S. that did not set well with the top government honchos in China. It was case of he said, we said and our courts sided with the Chinese business person - not the Sands - by awarding him $40 plus million dollars for his efforts on behalf of the Sands. It's business, not a way to make the Government of China to lose face.
Visa restrictions are a very foolish way to try and give Adelson a slap for his supposed indiscretions. Mr Adelson has done quite a bit to enhance his presence in China and should be rewarded for his efforts, not slapped on the wrist. Not only will these travel restriction hurt the Sands but other properties that depend on the additional traffic to maintain their market share in a highly competitive arena. I would hope that the real power behind what is going on will have second thoughts and look to the future of this thriving gaming and resort capital called Macau. American companies have a large stake in this area and are planning to add to the development in the resort and gaming industry there. It's really does behoove the Chinese authorities to take a step back and embrace what is happening to Macau - interference only holds back progress.
Just one more thought, this may not have been done with Sheldon Adelson in mind, but it does have a smell of pay back to it. These type of restrictions are never good for business, maybe it's time to rethink these holds on tourism........
Analysis: So the Sands people said things in court in the U.S. that did not set well with the top government honchos in China. It was case of he said, we said and our courts sided with the Chinese business person - not the Sands - by awarding him $40 plus million dollars for his efforts on behalf of the Sands. It's business, not a way to make the Government of China to lose face.
Visa restrictions are a very foolish way to try and give Adelson a slap for his supposed indiscretions. Mr Adelson has done quite a bit to enhance his presence in China and should be rewarded for his efforts, not slapped on the wrist. Not only will these travel restriction hurt the Sands but other properties that depend on the additional traffic to maintain their market share in a highly competitive arena. I would hope that the real power behind what is going on will have second thoughts and look to the future of this thriving gaming and resort capital called Macau. American companies have a large stake in this area and are planning to add to the development in the resort and gaming industry there. It's really does behoove the Chinese authorities to take a step back and embrace what is happening to Macau - interference only holds back progress.
Just one more thought, this may not have been done with Sheldon Adelson in mind, but it does have a smell of pay back to it. These type of restrictions are never good for business, maybe it's time to rethink these holds on tourism........
Report a Concern
More GLG News in
Consumer Goods & Services
Most Popular:
Source Article | Expert Analyses
What’s Not Selling at Saks
blogs.wsj.com
In Rare Move, Luxury-Goods Makers Trim Their Prices in U.S.
online.wsj.com
If Detroit Fails, Foreign Makers Could Be Buffer
www.nytimes.com
Democrats Plot Detroit Rescue
online.wsj.com
Expedia shuffles executives, brands
www.bizjournals.com
Luxury Retailers may be a solid long term play
November 19, 2008
To Survive, Saks Needs To Respond To Market Challenges
November 19, 2008
Survival For Saks Is Daunting
November 19, 2008
Price Deflation On Luxury Brands Like LVMH, Burberry And Gucci Will Likely Pressure Aspirational Brands Like Coach (COH).
November 18, 2008
Circuit City Retrenchment delaying the inevitable
November 10, 2008

