Subscribe to Updates in Legal, Economic & Regulatory Affairs

RSS By Email

RSS By RSS

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Subscribe in Bloglines


The Expertise Imperative and Compliance Technology
Access to a diverse array of specialized expert inputs drives superior decisions in every organizational context: within corporations, by investors and consultancies, and within nonprofits. When decision makers are confident of their decision inputs, they can respond more quickly and creatively to challenges and opportunities.Learn more about GLG's Compliance Framework


This page may include content provided by Council Members, your access to which is subject to the Terms of Use.
Find Out More

August 16, 2007

Surface Transportation Board Proposes Revising Railroad Cost of Capital Methodology

This analysis is solely the work of the author. It has not been edited or endorsed by GLG.
Analysis By:
Implications: The Surface Transportation Board has proposed to change its methodology for calculating the railroad industry cost of capital.  The cost of capital is used for several regulatory purposes.  Lowering the cost of capital, as proposed by the agency, could increase the rate relief available to captive shippers.

Analysis:  On August 14, 2007, the Surface Transportation Board (STB) issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NOPR) to revise its methodology for calculating the railroad cost of capital (COC), specifically the cost of equity component (COE). In the past, the STB has used a single-stage discounted cash flow (DCF) model. The STB now proposes to use the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) for the future, probably starting for 2006.

The NOPR indicates that the COC and the COE could be sharply lower. For example, for 2005, the STB had determined a COE of 15.2% and a COC of 12.2% using DCF. Using CAPM, the STB calculates a COE of 7.5% and a COC of 6.8%.

The STB uses the COC for several regulatory purposes including determining whether carriers are revenue adequate and calculating variable and stand-alone costs.

The STB’s NOPR, if adopted, could increase the regulatory relief available to captive railroad shippers, who have been very frustrated with the STB’s unwillingness to grant rate relief. However, considerable implementation would be required before such change occurred.



Report a Concern

More GLG News in
Legal, Economic & Regulatory Affairs

Most Popular:
Source Article | Expert Analyses
 

GLG News: What Experts Think Is Important





Analytics


Generated at 2008-11-21T13:45:47.600