August 27, 2008
Shell, ExxonMobil, others cope with environment in Athabasca.
Analysis of:
Environmentalists weigh costs of Alberta oil sands | www.iht.com
This analysis is solely the work of the author. It has not been edited or endorsed by GLG.
Implications: Rob Gilles with the Associated Press in Fort McMurray, Alberta reported in the August 26 issue of the International Herald Tribune that Shell is rapidly expanding oil sand production from Muskeg river open pit mines in the Athabasca region of Alberta. They are joined by ExxonMobil, Chevron, Imperial Oil and others in a development that covers an area the size of New York State. Current daily production of 1.5 million bbl/day will triple by 2020. Alberta, with 175 billion potential barrels has more oil than Venezuela, Russia and Iran. Because of immense water requirements to extract the crude oil, environmentalists are deeply concerned. Oil sand operations produce 4% of Canadian greenhouse gas emissions. Tailing ponds next to rivers threaten fresh water streams with chemical pollution. The oil companies are fully aware of both the criticism and the real dangers involved. Measures are necessary to make operations acceptable to the public. The government cannot ignore the new jobs.
Analysis: As of right now, any attempt to reduce the expansion of oil sand projects is certain to be defeated. High crude oil prices sustain them and the employment they create. The only way out is to increase extraction budgets to improve the environment. At a minimum, potable water supplies must be projected. The land must remain habitable for wildlife. Extraction costs today are approaching the $50/bbl mark. What will the costs be to satisfy the public and prevent the projects from becoming nuisances? Possibly $5/bbl. Add in another $5/bbl for a publicity campaign to convince the non-believers that, indeed, the projects are beneficial in every way to the economy and the environment. Oil from the mines thus becomes even more than costly than it already is. With a substantially higher extraction cost, oil from sand becomes a primary target for shut in if and when crude oil prices drop below $100/bbl. The world is approaching an energy situation where energy extraction costs collide with consumer’s pocket books. This is no small consideration in an international economy that depends on modestly-priced fuels.
Analysis: As of right now, any attempt to reduce the expansion of oil sand projects is certain to be defeated. High crude oil prices sustain them and the employment they create. The only way out is to increase extraction budgets to improve the environment. At a minimum, potable water supplies must be projected. The land must remain habitable for wildlife. Extraction costs today are approaching the $50/bbl mark. What will the costs be to satisfy the public and prevent the projects from becoming nuisances? Possibly $5/bbl. Add in another $5/bbl for a publicity campaign to convince the non-believers that, indeed, the projects are beneficial in every way to the economy and the environment. Oil from the mines thus becomes even more than costly than it already is. With a substantially higher extraction cost, oil from sand becomes a primary target for shut in if and when crude oil prices drop below $100/bbl. The world is approaching an energy situation where energy extraction costs collide with consumer’s pocket books. This is no small consideration in an international economy that depends on modestly-priced fuels.
Report a Concern
More GLG News in
Energy & Industrials
Most Popular:
Source Article | Expert Analyses
"The technology that will save humanity"
www.salon.com
Dow Chemical to Take `Radical Actions' to Reach Profit Goal
www.bloomberg.com
YRC Reports $823 Million Q3 Impairment Charge
www.reuters.com
At Exxon, Making the Case for Oil
www.nytimes.com
USA-Pickens Puts Texas Wind Farm Project On Hold
www.kbtx.com
Petrochem Giants in Crisis Mode
November 20, 2008
Land Ahoy...The Dawn of Concentrated Solar Power
November 18, 2008
Oil is Forever or Until it Runs Out
November 18, 2008
Similarity to early '80's Remarkable... with one big difference
November 14, 2008
Concentrated Solar Power(CSP): Economics Are Not There
November 11, 2008

