January 18, 2007
Scleral expansion: A legitimate contender in the presbyobia arena?
Analysis of:
Scleral spacing procedures investigated for presbyopia |
This analysis is solely the work of the author. It has not been edited or endorsed by GLG.
Implications: This article describes the Phase II trial results of the PreView Scleral Implants (ReFocus Group Inc.) for the treatment of presbyopia. Presbyopia is the natural age related loss of accommodation, or near focusing ability that leads to people wearing reading glasses. Scleral implants alter the configuration of the eye around the lens equator allowing some restoration of accommodation. The Phase I trials with scleral implants were of limited success. The Phase II Trials utilized an automated tunneling device designed to ease the surgical procedure. As well, changes were made to the scleral implants enhancing stability. The six month postoperative data shows that 80% of patients had 20/40 vision at near without significant loss of distance vision. Phase III trials began enrolling in summer of 2006 and have currently enrolled more than 150 eyes.
Analysis: While the visual results of scleral implants appear to be promising, there are still significant questions about the safety and the difficulty of this procedure. When evaluating treatments for presbyopia, several important issues exist including quality of near vision, preservation of distance vision, reversibility of the procedure, technical difficulty of the procedure, and overall safety of the procedure. When compared to the other available options for presbyopia, scleral implants are significantly more invasive and have a higher potential for complications. This is due to the fact that the implants have to be placed in the sclera which can lead to inflammation and erosion. Given the other less invasive presbyopia options available such as multifocal lenses, intracorneal lenses, conductive keratoplasty, and multifocal LASIK, it is unlikely that a more invasive procedure is likely to catch on.
Analysis: While the visual results of scleral implants appear to be promising, there are still significant questions about the safety and the difficulty of this procedure. When evaluating treatments for presbyopia, several important issues exist including quality of near vision, preservation of distance vision, reversibility of the procedure, technical difficulty of the procedure, and overall safety of the procedure. When compared to the other available options for presbyopia, scleral implants are significantly more invasive and have a higher potential for complications. This is due to the fact that the implants have to be placed in the sclera which can lead to inflammation and erosion. Given the other less invasive presbyopia options available such as multifocal lenses, intracorneal lenses, conductive keratoplasty, and multifocal LASIK, it is unlikely that a more invasive procedure is likely to catch on.
Report a Concern
More GLG News in
Healthcare
Most Popular:
Source Article | Expert Analyses
Painkiller Risk Found for Heart Patients
www.nytimes.com
FDA Asks if Pain Pill Is Tamper-Proof
online.wsj.com
Merck KGaA: Overall Survival in First-Line NSCLC Reaches 15 Months
www.pipelinereview.com
Hospitals See Drop in Paying Patients
www.nytimes.com
Gardasil, Merck's Cervical Cancer Vaccine, Demonstrated Efficacy in Preventing HPV-Related Disease in Males in Phase III Study
www.fiercebiotech.com
Will contact lens solutions cost more to ship and store?
November 13, 2008
Economy's impact on healthcare facilities
November 13, 2008
Tamper Proof Narcotic Pain pill? YES
November 13, 2008
CVS Escalates the Generic Price War
November 13, 2008
A closer look
November 11, 2008

