March 21, 2007
Sarbanes-Oxley may be overkill in its present form
Voluntary compliance was in essence what we had before.
Looking at Corporate America more closely is important, but not with a microscope.
The ultimate affect of Sarbanes-Oxley will lead to more money for accounting firms and the creation of compliance issues that may eat into the profit structure more than the adverse affect of lesser compliance.
Analysis: Congress is now trying to close the barn door after the horses are out. Although their effort at possibly realizing that the act went too far is valiant, simply relaxing compliance for the smaller players, under 700 million capitalization, is not necessarily the answer. Modification should be equal across the board. Are we in essence playing favorites?
While technical compliance with the act can be modified a close reading of the current act is essential in ascertaining all the guidelines. http://fl1.findlaw.com/news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/gwbush/sarbanesoxley072302.pdf
An interesting look at the strategies for compliance can be found at http://www.pwc.com/Extweb/NewCoAtWork.nsf/docid/D0D7F79003C6D64485256CF30074D66C
Importantly, Congress may have an opportunity to turn a great idea into a better model for society. It is important that we do not make it voluntary, otherwise we may end up back where we started.
Report a Concern
More GLG News in
Legal, Economic & Regulatory Affairs
Partial settlement reached in Exxon Valdez case
www.dallasnews.com
Court Decision: Tiffany v. eBay
www1.nysd.uscourts.gov
U.S. trade commission loses bid for Rambus appeal
www.reuters.com
Decision: 20th Century Fox v. Cablevision
www.eff.org
Billions Not for the Plaintiffs Bar
www.law.com
Exxon Settles!
September 1, 2008
Rambus Wins Again
August 29, 2008
Does Cablevision Matter?
August 29, 2008
From eBay, the Law Should Expect More
August 29, 2008
Afghanistan: March Back Naked, the Ultimate Concessions: Theirs or Ours.
August 25, 2008

