Subscribe to Updates in Healthcare

RSS By Email

RSS By RSS

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Subscribe in Bloglines


The Expertise Imperative and Compliance Technology
Access to a diverse array of specialized expert inputs drives superior decisions in every organizational context: within corporations, by investors and consultancies, and within nonprofits. When decision makers are confident of their decision inputs, they can respond more quickly and creatively to challenges and opportunities.Learn more about GLG's Compliance Framework


This page may include content provided by Council Members, your access to which is subject to the Terms of Use.
Find Out More

October 4, 2007

SCHIP legislation vetoed by President Bush

Analysis of: Bush vetoes bill on children's health care | www.reuters.com
This analysis is solely the work of the author. It has not been edited or endorsed by GLG.
Analysis By:
Glen McDaniel, MS, MBA, President and Chief Executive OfficerGlen McDaniel, MS, MBA
President and Chief Executive Officer, GM Global
Implications: Many lower income families depend on the SCHIP program administered by individual states to pay for healthcare. Republicans see this as just another entitlement program while Democrats see it as an essential way of making sure children have access to the basics in healthcare. This veto might be based more on political than financial (and certainly medical) grounds.

Analysis: This morning  President Bush vetoed legislation authorizing extension of the SCHIP program. The bill on his  desk seeks to authorize an additional $34.7 billion over 5 years to cover an additional 10 million children. The veto was not a surprise since the White House had proudly threatened veto for weeks now.

There is bound to be  a huge outcry from Children's advocacy groups, some healthcare workers, states and Democrats in Congress. The Democrats see this as a callous move, plus political fodder to use in 2008.  The President and his supporters see this as a sneaky way to move towards government healthcare. That socialized medicine fear overrides all other considerations. Cost is an issue certainly, but is defensible when put into context that 1 day of funding the Iraq war cost $300m which would cover 246, 000 under SCHIP. Also the Democrats proposed  to fund the increase through a tobacco tax. Not such a bad thing; right? Not if it means socialized medicine, counter some Republicans.

Several Republicans have joined the Democrats in voting for this bill which is supported by approximately 70% of Americans according to several polls. They are also concerned that a vote against children's healthcare could well cost them votes in 08. However there is not enough votes in the House to override the veto.

The concern I have is that this veto is being driven more by ideology and "sticking to the script" than by real fiscal concerns. Note the mad federal spending in the last 4-6 years. The implications will be political for sure, but what will be the medical fallout? That's the bigger concern to me.

Other Analyses of the Same Source Article:
Medicaid Market Attractive, But at Cost to Commercial Underwriting
November 8, 2007, Author: GLG Expert Contributor

Report a Concern

GLG News: What Experts Think Is Important





Analytics


Generated at 2008-09-06T21:45:17.077