February 19, 2008
Regulatory Change Could Mean Millions to Big Pharma
Analysis of:
F.D.A. Seeks to Broaden Range of Use for Drugs | www.nytimes.com
This analysis is solely the work of the author. It has not been edited or endorsed by GLG.
Implications: A proposed regulatory change proposed on the Friday before a holiday weekend could have a major impact on pharmaceutical profits (and consumer health).
Analysis: The FDA is considering whether to allow greater leeway in allowing pharmaceuticals to promote off-label uses of drugs. While this rule would not allow pharmaceutical companies to advertise off-label use, it would permit them to share journal articles about non-approved uses with physicians.
No doubt, there are pros (better informed physicians) and cons (disincentive for investment in studies necessary to gain a new indication) to such a rule change. But one thing is for sure; if pharmaceuticals are allowed to disseminate (truthful) information (in the form of published studies) regarding off-label use, it will translate into significant new profits for drug companies. The only question is, how much.
Makers of drugs who's promise has not been fully explored, stand most to gain. Drugs such as statins, SERMS (Raloxifene and Tamoxifen) stand to see increases in prescriptions as doctors (particularly generalists) are likely to become more familiar with the benefits of off-label use, courtesy of the manufacturers. As such, look for Pfizer, Lilly and Astra Zenica to be benefit significantly.
Analysis: The FDA is considering whether to allow greater leeway in allowing pharmaceuticals to promote off-label uses of drugs. While this rule would not allow pharmaceutical companies to advertise off-label use, it would permit them to share journal articles about non-approved uses with physicians.
No doubt, there are pros (better informed physicians) and cons (disincentive for investment in studies necessary to gain a new indication) to such a rule change. But one thing is for sure; if pharmaceuticals are allowed to disseminate (truthful) information (in the form of published studies) regarding off-label use, it will translate into significant new profits for drug companies. The only question is, how much.
Makers of drugs who's promise has not been fully explored, stand most to gain. Drugs such as statins, SERMS (Raloxifene and Tamoxifen) stand to see increases in prescriptions as doctors (particularly generalists) are likely to become more familiar with the benefits of off-label use, courtesy of the manufacturers. As such, look for Pfizer, Lilly and Astra Zenica to be benefit significantly.
Report a Concern
More GLG News in
Legal, Economic & Regulatory Affairs
Most Popular:
Source Article | Expert Analyses
Iran Responds Obliquely to Nuclear Plan
www.nytimes.com
"Portabilidad supera primera prueba"
ve.invertia.com
Penn National Gaming Cancels Its Sale to Private Equity Firms
www.nytimes.com
(Pakistani) Smuggling Ring May Have Shared Nuke Design With Iran???!!!
www.usatoday.com
Billionaire Epstein jailed for soliciting sex with minors
www.guardian.co.uk
Number Portability Enhances Competition in Mexican Phone Services
July 17, 2008
Perhaps it is not wise to keep your friend's enemies closer!
July 7, 2008
Assumption for the oil market: the nuclear standoff will continue
July 7, 2008
Good News for Penn Gaming -- in the Long Run
July 7, 2008

