Subscribe to Updates in Legal, Economic & Regulatory Affairs

RSS By Email

RSS By RSS

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Subscribe in Bloglines


The Expertise Imperative and Compliance Technology
Access to a diverse array of specialized expert inputs drives superior decisions in every organizational context: within corporations, by investors and consultancies, and within nonprofits. When decision makers are confident of their decision inputs, they can respond more quickly and creatively to challenges and opportunities.Learn more about GLG's Compliance Framework


This page may include content provided by Council Members, your access to which is subject to the Terms of Use.
Find Out More

December 7, 2006

Qui Tam-The Next Litigation Phase

This analysis is solely the work of the author. It has not been edited or endorsed by GLG.
Analysis By:
Martin Alpert
Claim Director, CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED SERVICES GROUP INC
Implications: >A vehicle to recover millions in fraudulent claims.
>Individuals suing on behalf of the Federal Government.
>Insiders protected from exposing fraud.
>Insiders may receive a % as compensation.

Analysis: The False Claims Act was designed to encourage citizens with knowledge of fraud against the government to come forward by authorizing them to file a civil suit in the name of the government, and by rewarding them with a possible percentage of the recovery. The Act provides for treble damages and penalties of $11,000 per violation for virtually any kind of fraud on federally funded programs. The qui tam provisions of the statute permit a private citizen (individual or corporation) who brings suit under the False Claims Act  to receive up to 30% of the recovery, with the average share around 17%.  In trying to fully understand how the statute works see these sites for some guidance http://www.expertlaw.com/library/employment/qui-tam.html or http://www.quitaminfocenter.com/

A federal jury in Chicago recently ordered Virginia-based health insurer Amerigroup, which had operated Medicaid managed care plans in Illinois, to pay $48 million in damages—an amount that will triple to $144 million under the federal False Claims Act—for discrimination against pregnant women and other beneficiaries with health issues. Will Jeff McWalters bail?  Will the federal government make it tougher for Amerigroup to do business in certain states?  Will this verdict stand up on appeal?  What about Amerigroup's involvement in the other 12 or so states it does business?

Other Analyses of the Same Source Article:
Supreme Court Stops Unsubstantiated Verdicts
December 7, 2006, Author: Martin Alpert, Claim Director, CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED SERVICES GROUP INC

Report a Concern

More GLG News in
Legal, Economic & Regulatory Affairs

Most Popular:
Source Article | Expert Analyses
 

GLG News: What Experts Think Is Important





Analytics


Generated at 2008-09-06T21:45:17.077