November 15, 2007
Pension Pressure Reduced - Good News For Corporate Valuation
Analysis of:
Out of the Shaows? PBGC Deficit Shrinks by $5 billion. | www.cfo.com
This analysis is solely the work of the author. It has not been edited or endorsed by GLG.
Implications: The reduction of the PBGC's deficit reduces pressure on Congress to take action that could impact corporate values. Such action would most probably hurt corporate value by adversely affecting cash flow and risk.
Analysis: The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) has been running a deficit for a number of years. Although there is no immediate liquidity crisis in the PBGC, long-term solvency is an issue. To make sure the PBGC is solvent, Congress has taken actions to relieve this pending crisis (i.e., Pension Protection Act of 2006). If the PBGC deficit continued to grow, Congress would be forced to do one of the following:
1. Subsidize the PBGC through taxes, etc.
2. Increase premiums for covered pension plans/firms.
3. Increase the power of the PBGC to levy fines, liens, etc on firms with under funded defined benefit plans.
The first alternative is the least attractive to Congress. This leaves the last two alternatives. Both would negatively impact the cash flows and risk of firms with defined benefit plans.
The bottom line is simple. This reduction in the PBGC is good news for firms with defined benefits plans.
Analysis: The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) has been running a deficit for a number of years. Although there is no immediate liquidity crisis in the PBGC, long-term solvency is an issue. To make sure the PBGC is solvent, Congress has taken actions to relieve this pending crisis (i.e., Pension Protection Act of 2006). If the PBGC deficit continued to grow, Congress would be forced to do one of the following:
1. Subsidize the PBGC through taxes, etc.
2. Increase premiums for covered pension plans/firms.
3. Increase the power of the PBGC to levy fines, liens, etc on firms with under funded defined benefit plans.
The first alternative is the least attractive to Congress. This leaves the last two alternatives. Both would negatively impact the cash flows and risk of firms with defined benefit plans.
The bottom line is simple. This reduction in the PBGC is good news for firms with defined benefits plans.
Report a Concern
More GLG News in
Accounting & Financial Analysis
Most Popular:
Source Article | Expert Analyses
Could Bank Rules Break The Fair Value Debate
www.cfo.com
SFAS Exposure Draft On Going Concern
www.fasb.org
Centrica secures LNG cargo from Qatar
www.ogj.com
IMF Chief Curbs Summit Expectations
www.ft.com
The Future of Fair Value Accounting and Mark to Market (FASB 157)
November 19, 2008
The Changing Effects of Economic and Political Consequences on Accounting Rules - The Fair Value Debate
November 14, 2008
LNG - The Cross Border, Global Arbitrage Opportunity?
November 10, 2008
The Increasing Relevance of Going Concern in the Declining Economy - Implications for Analysts
November 10, 2008

