Subscribe to Updates in Financial & Business Services

RSS By Email

RSS By RSS

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Subscribe in Bloglines


The Expertise Imperative and Compliance Technology
Access to a diverse array of specialized expert inputs drives superior decisions in every organizational context: within corporations, by investors and consultancies, and within nonprofits. When decision makers are confident of their decision inputs, they can respond more quickly and creatively to challenges and opportunities.Learn more about GLG's Compliance Framework


This page may include content provided by Council Members, your access to which is subject to the Terms of Use.
Find Out More

November 7, 2007

Metavante has a pile of cash now, but does it have a list of good acquisition candidates?

This analysis is solely the work of the author. It has not been edited or endorsed by GLG.
Analysis By:
Art Gillis, PresidentArt Gillis
President, Computer Based Solutions, Inc.
Implications: With excess cash from the seperation, what are the possible acquisition opportunities for Metavante.

Analysis:  “Insider information” to me means what tech vendors say in their press releases. It came from inside the company. So as I understand it, the justification for spinning off Metavante from M&I Bank was that both companies needed cash for acquisitions. I understand the bank’s need because there are lots of good banks just waiting to be swooped up by a better bank at three times book value. But I don’t understand where Metavante is going to do its shopping. A year ago, I took inventory of what was available and here’s the tally:
Theoretically there were 23 potential acquisitions for Metavante if it stayed within the boundaries of equivalent bank technology companies.
5 were candidates as long as they didn’t get too greedy.
7 were locked out because their owners were not impressed with BIG, culture differences, and just simply a fierce desire for independence.
8 just didn’t have any appeal for a company like Metavante that needs size and innovation as opposed to mom and pop shops with me-too products.
3 were buyers so they weren’t ready to give up the fight to be a major contender.

The churn rate was very low during this past year. CheckFree, Carreker, Corillian, Digital Insight and eFunds were on my list of 23 that got acquired. The remaining 18 are not my idea of major league companies that need big money to bring them on board. Metavante could cut their advertising budget and use the money to go shopping for any of the 7 real possibilities remaining on my list. They didn’t need OPM. So what does this tell us? My answer is, don’t expect any big announcements from cash-rich MV unless it shops for the bottom four of the now Big 8 (Open Solutions Inc., Harland Financial Solutions, Computer Services, Inc. or COCC), or goes far afield into new vertical industries. Do I hear a bid for TEMENOS?

There were only 12 acquisitions by the Big 8 in 2006. That’s the smallest number in the past ten years and the third smallest number in the past 22 years. Is the acquisitions game over? Is it the bottom of the 9th? Is Yogi yelling it ain’t over till it’s over? Beats me, I just compile the numbers.


Report a Concern

GLG News: What Experts Think Is Important





Analytics


Generated at 2008-08-27T21:14:31.680