May 19, 2008
Limiting Lawsuits:Bush makes an attempt!
Analysis of:
Bush administration rules limit lawsuits | ap.google.com
This analysis is solely the work of the author. It has not been edited or endorsed by GLG.
Implications: Should the President get involved in limiting lawsuits?Is Federal Preemption at least one effective mechanism in limiting lawsuits?
Analysis: The Republicans & Democrats have been arguing for a long time over the issue of limiting lawsuits! The Bush administration has struggled for just as long to try and limit lawsuits. Bush may be gaining ground with the issue of Federal Preemption, especially with the hammer of the Supremacy Clause. Rooted well in our system of government is some logic that under certain circumstances federal law & regulation supersedes state law. The growing complaint is that this at times lets many companies gets dismissed for technical reasons & consumers are the ones that feel the sting. At times it is argued that companies have a sort of immunity. The drafters of the preambles for Bush in the proposed rule amendments attempt to emphasize these just give guidance to possible preemption not actual preemption: arose by any other name, or if it looks like it and acts like it. The drafting of these new rules by the Bush administration may be trying to say it is only to spell out the scope of preemption, but it seems apparent what is really going to happen. http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2008/05/15/90025.htm
Analysis: The Republicans & Democrats have been arguing for a long time over the issue of limiting lawsuits! The Bush administration has struggled for just as long to try and limit lawsuits. Bush may be gaining ground with the issue of Federal Preemption, especially with the hammer of the Supremacy Clause. Rooted well in our system of government is some logic that under certain circumstances federal law & regulation supersedes state law. The growing complaint is that this at times lets many companies gets dismissed for technical reasons & consumers are the ones that feel the sting. At times it is argued that companies have a sort of immunity. The drafters of the preambles for Bush in the proposed rule amendments attempt to emphasize these just give guidance to possible preemption not actual preemption: arose by any other name, or if it looks like it and acts like it. The drafting of these new rules by the Bush administration may be trying to say it is only to spell out the scope of preemption, but it seems apparent what is really going to happen. http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2008/05/15/90025.htm
The American people can only now keep stock in the checks and balances of congress & the Supreme Court.
Report a Concern
More GLG News in
Legal, Economic & Regulatory Affairs
Most Popular:
Source Article | Expert Analyses
Partial settlement reached in Exxon Valdez case
www.dallasnews.com
Court Decision: Tiffany v. eBay
www1.nysd.uscourts.gov
U.S. trade commission loses bid for Rambus appeal
www.reuters.com
Decision: 20th Century Fox v. Cablevision
www.eff.org
Billions Not for the Plaintiffs Bar
www.law.com
Exxon Settles!
September 1, 2008
Rambus Wins Again
August 29, 2008
Does Cablevision Matter?
August 29, 2008
From eBay, the Law Should Expect More
August 29, 2008
Afghanistan: March Back Naked, the Ultimate Concessions: Theirs or Ours.
August 25, 2008

