October 10, 2008
Just Like 2001 But Very Different
Analysis of:
Analysts cautious commercial real estate outlook | www.forbes.com
This analysis is solely the work of the author. It has not been edited or endorsed by GLG.
Implications: The recent Goldman Sachs analysis of the prolonged downturn in commercial real estate is based upon a strict comparison with the 2001 downturn during that recession. Their numbers reveal that the 38 REITs they follow will suffer a total return of NEGATIVE 4.5% Are they for real? What do these young analysts know about what is really happening in the commercial real estate markets? I submit, not very much!
Analysis: The three analysts responsible for this latest report failed to do their homework because their study starts with an obvious flaw in that it ignores the fact that since 2001 this country has become over stored, over officed, over warehoused and over malled. Most of the downturn would have eventually occurred as a result of the over building. The sudden evaporation of cheap money and stupid lenders only accelerated the process.
They also failed to account for the fact that virtually every sector of the commercial real estate market has been suffering from heavily inflated prices and a true "buyers frenzy" brought about by cheap money and unrealistic demand for product without regard to quality of location or tenancy or occupancy rates.
This commercial real estate "BUBBLE" BEARS NO RELATIONSHIP TO THE CONDITIONS THAT PREVAILED IN 2001 ! Therefore I would suggest that the Goldman Sachs report be ignored and GLG readers continue to take the bank analysts with the proverbial "grain of salt".
Analysis: The three analysts responsible for this latest report failed to do their homework because their study starts with an obvious flaw in that it ignores the fact that since 2001 this country has become over stored, over officed, over warehoused and over malled. Most of the downturn would have eventually occurred as a result of the over building. The sudden evaporation of cheap money and stupid lenders only accelerated the process.
They also failed to account for the fact that virtually every sector of the commercial real estate market has been suffering from heavily inflated prices and a true "buyers frenzy" brought about by cheap money and unrealistic demand for product without regard to quality of location or tenancy or occupancy rates.
This commercial real estate "BUBBLE" BEARS NO RELATIONSHIP TO THE CONDITIONS THAT PREVAILED IN 2001 ! Therefore I would suggest that the Goldman Sachs report be ignored and GLG readers continue to take the bank analysts with the proverbial "grain of salt".
Report a Concern
More GLG News in
Real Estate
Most Popular:
Source Article | Expert Analyses
Consumer Search Trends Show Increased Interest in Real Estate by Potential Home Buyers
www.marketwatch.com
Mag Mile Maul
www.chicagobusiness.com
DBSI Failure Shows Spread of Turmoil in Real Estate
online.wsj.com
Ackman Says Target REIT IPO Would Raise $5.1 Billion
www.bloomberg.com:80
Whatever you do, don't buy Sears
money.cnn.com
"Bottom" of the housing market is not found solely at the relationship between income and house prices.
December 1, 2008
NAR--Not At-all Realistic
November 28, 2008
Believe Half of What You See and None Of What You Read
November 25, 2008
WITH FRIENDS LIKE THIS, TARGET DOESN'T NEED ENEMIES
November 24, 2008
IT'S STARTING!
November 20, 2008

