June 20, 2007
It's About Knowing When Machines Have to Stop and People Have to Participate
2. Humans do not live life in serial
3. Until more human interaction can be brought to the process, the machines will continue to be unable to process and index intuitively
Analysis: I have been of this same mind for years; the challenge is that mass production (being able to solve for billions of searches) is a machine exercise, not a human exercise. What is missing, and a facet of a business I founded and sold a few years ago, was a team of people whose only job was to review search data and draw conclusions, connections, and intersections to the paths so that nonlinear search could produce quasi-linear results.
In the machine world, life exists in a serial, however, humans are multitasking, multidimensional, and visceral – which will dumfound the machines. Unless significant human interaction can be introduced into the mix (unlikely because of the scale) search will be serial for the foreseeable future.
Report a Concern
More GLG News in
Technology, Media & Telecom
Why Apple Should Buy Dell
lowendmac.com
BlackBerry maker battles back
money.cnn.com
No spectrum shortage: DoT
www.business-standard.com
Virtualization's Pain Points
www.forbes.com
Ciena AT&T News Gives Equipment Provider a Boost
www.washingtonpost.com
What VCs Should Invest In ... In this Economy
November 24, 2008
TV Numbers Aren't Good - But Don't Rule Out The Power Of The Consumer
November 20, 2008
A Note on Consumer Behaviour with an eye on Experience in Africa
November 20, 2008
Sprint – Cleaning House By First Asking For Volunteers – Will Not Work
November 18, 2008
Demystifying Carbon Footprints
November 18, 2008

