Subscribe to Updates in Energy & Industrials

RSS By Email

RSS By RSS

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Subscribe in Bloglines


The Expertise Imperative and Compliance Technology
Access to a diverse array of specialized expert inputs drives superior decisions in every organizational context: within corporations, by investors and consultancies, and within nonprofits. When decision makers are confident of their decision inputs, they can respond more quickly and creatively to challenges and opportunities.Learn more about GLG's Compliance Framework


This page may include content provided by Council Members, your access to which is subject to the Terms of Use.
Find Out More

June 23, 2008

It Is Not Just Capital Costs that Hinder Coal Plants

Analysis of: : Rising Costs Hinder New Power Plant Builds | db.riskwaters.com
This analysis is solely the work of the author. It has not been edited or endorsed by GLG.
Analysis By:
Thomas Shewski
Owner, High Energy Services
Implications:     As the article correctly points out, capital costs to build a new power plant have risen considerably since 2000; coal plants included.  It is not just the up-front capital costs that have affected decisions to build new coal plants as discussed in the commentary section.

Analysis:     When a new power plant is considered, a real- levelized-cost analysis is performed to determine the alternatives’ economics.  Such analysis considers the plants’ capital costs, return on/of capital requirements, fuel costs, fuel transportation costs, fixed operations and maintenance costs, and emissions-related costs.  Such real-levelized cost analysis is generally done over the 40-year life of the plant, and is also sometimes called “life cycle costs”.
 
     As the referenced article pointed out, the capital costs to build new power plants has soared; including coal plants.  For natural gas-fired plants, the cost of natural gas has risen dramatically in the last few years.  More recently, the coal and transportation costs have soured; in some cases doubling.  This has helped close the economic advantage of coal-fired generation over natural gas-fired generation.
 
     This gap has further closed because of the potential risks and cost impact of CO2-limiting legislation that would essentially tax CO2 emissions from fossil fuel-fired power plants.  A coal plant emits approximately 1 tonne (metric ton) of CO2 per MWh, while a natural gas plant emits approximately 0.4 to 0.5 tonne of CO2 per MWh.  This CO2 cost on coal, on a static analysis basis, closes the gap between coal-fired generation and natural gas-fired generation.              

    The “Climate Security Act of 2008” sponsored by Senators Lieberman and Warner if implemented in its current form is anticipated to add approximately $40/MWh to the real- levelized cost of a coal plant.  Such potential CO2 risk and costs have slowed the announcement of new coal plants and even the cancellation of previously announced coal plants.  New natural gas-fired power plants have been the beneficiary of these cancellations.


Report a Concern

GLG News: What Experts Think Is Important





Analytics


Generated at 2008-10-12T21:45:17.397