June 23, 2008
It Is Not Just Capital Costs that Hinder Coal Plants
Analysis of:
: Rising Costs Hinder New Power Plant Builds | db.riskwaters.com
This analysis is solely the work of the author. It has not been edited or endorsed by GLG.
Implications: As the article correctly points out, capital costs to build a new power plant have risen considerably since 2000; coal plants included. It is not just the up-front capital costs that have affected decisions to build new coal plants as discussed in the commentary section.
Analysis: When a new power plant is considered, a real- levelized-cost analysis is performed to determine the alternatives’ economics. Such analysis considers the plants’ capital costs, return on/of capital requirements, fuel costs, fuel transportation costs, fixed operations and maintenance costs, and emissions-related costs. Such real-levelized cost analysis is generally done over the 40-year life of the plant, and is also sometimes called “life cycle costs”.
As the referenced article pointed out, the capital costs to build new power plants has soared; including coal plants. For natural gas-fired plants, the cost of natural gas has risen dramatically in the last few years. More recently, the coal and transportation costs have soured; in some cases doubling. This has helped close the economic advantage of coal-fired generation over natural gas-fired generation.
This gap has further closed because of the potential risks and cost impact of CO2-limiting legislation that would essentially tax CO2 emissions from fossil fuel-fired power plants. A coal plant emits approximately 1 tonne (metric ton) of CO2 per MWh, while a natural gas plant emits approximately 0.4 to 0.5 tonne of CO2 per MWh. This CO2 cost on coal, on a static analysis basis, closes the gap between coal-fired generation and natural gas-fired generation.
The “Climate Security Act of 2008” sponsored by Senators Lieberman and Warner if implemented in its current form is anticipated to add approximately $40/MWh to the real- levelized cost of a coal plant. Such potential CO2 risk and costs have slowed the announcement of new coal plants and even the cancellation of previously announced coal plants. New natural gas-fired power plants have been the beneficiary of these cancellations.
Analysis: When a new power plant is considered, a real- levelized-cost analysis is performed to determine the alternatives’ economics. Such analysis considers the plants’ capital costs, return on/of capital requirements, fuel costs, fuel transportation costs, fixed operations and maintenance costs, and emissions-related costs. Such real-levelized cost analysis is generally done over the 40-year life of the plant, and is also sometimes called “life cycle costs”.
As the referenced article pointed out, the capital costs to build new power plants has soared; including coal plants. For natural gas-fired plants, the cost of natural gas has risen dramatically in the last few years. More recently, the coal and transportation costs have soured; in some cases doubling. This has helped close the economic advantage of coal-fired generation over natural gas-fired generation.
This gap has further closed because of the potential risks and cost impact of CO2-limiting legislation that would essentially tax CO2 emissions from fossil fuel-fired power plants. A coal plant emits approximately 1 tonne (metric ton) of CO2 per MWh, while a natural gas plant emits approximately 0.4 to 0.5 tonne of CO2 per MWh. This CO2 cost on coal, on a static analysis basis, closes the gap between coal-fired generation and natural gas-fired generation.
The “Climate Security Act of 2008” sponsored by Senators Lieberman and Warner if implemented in its current form is anticipated to add approximately $40/MWh to the real- levelized cost of a coal plant. Such potential CO2 risk and costs have slowed the announcement of new coal plants and even the cancellation of previously announced coal plants. New natural gas-fired power plants have been the beneficiary of these cancellations.
Report a Concern
More GLG News in
Energy & Industrials
Most Popular:
Source Article | Expert Analyses
Bombardier Predicts Continued Growth
www.avweb.com
Russia and Brazil crumble as commodity prices crash
www.telegraph.co.uk
Slimmer Packages Mean Slimmer Profits for Truckers
www.businessweek.com
Giant oil prospects lie in the distal portion of offshore East Mediterranean basin
www.ogj.com
Auto markets face ‘outright collapse’ in 2009
October 10, 2008
Shipping markets and commodities in the financial crisis
October 8, 2008
ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, others gird for tough times ahead
October 6, 2008
Good life ahead for those who were responsible of the financial crisis
September 29, 2008
Algae: the "green crude" of the future
September 29, 2008

