April 17, 2008
Is More Private Label At JCP The Right Move?
Analysis of:
J.C. Penney Curbs Expansion, Pushes Private Label | online.wsj.com
This analysis is solely the work of the author. It has not been edited or endorsed by GLG.
Implications: Many retailers over the years have gone down the path of increasing their private label penetration to the point where their business suffers at the top line, and eventually the bottom line. JCP is heavily penetrated with private brands now, and with the disappointng launch of American Living, pushing more private label may cross the line.
Analysis: Most large scale retailers have the abilty to incorporate a certain percentage of private label into their mix. The question is how much is too much. Unfortunately that answer is different for every retailer. A 15% penetration might be fine for one retailer, while 25% is comfortable for another. The one common denominator remains the fact that there is a point where too much private label becomes a negative to the consumer and ultimately the retailer. In these economic times, private label fills a need for lower price points for the consumer and higher margins for the retailer. However, the retailer who has established a certain level of quality is in a better position to pull it off. The Kirkland line at Costco is well known for its quality with its members. Introducing a new label, especially in juniors, is a treacherous undertaking. The assortment needs to be right on and current, as newness is king in this environment. The chance of that happening at JCP is remote based on how far out they will have to work, coupled with their lack of expertise in the Junior area. Certainly they have done a fantastic job with their signature Arizona line. Their denim continually shows up in consumer research as a national brand. But the question remains, how many different brands can a retailer support at one time? Pushing more private brands into the young men's and junior assortments seems to be a very risky move.
Analysis: Most large scale retailers have the abilty to incorporate a certain percentage of private label into their mix. The question is how much is too much. Unfortunately that answer is different for every retailer. A 15% penetration might be fine for one retailer, while 25% is comfortable for another. The one common denominator remains the fact that there is a point where too much private label becomes a negative to the consumer and ultimately the retailer. In these economic times, private label fills a need for lower price points for the consumer and higher margins for the retailer. However, the retailer who has established a certain level of quality is in a better position to pull it off. The Kirkland line at Costco is well known for its quality with its members. Introducing a new label, especially in juniors, is a treacherous undertaking. The assortment needs to be right on and current, as newness is king in this environment. The chance of that happening at JCP is remote based on how far out they will have to work, coupled with their lack of expertise in the Junior area. Certainly they have done a fantastic job with their signature Arizona line. Their denim continually shows up in consumer research as a national brand. But the question remains, how many different brands can a retailer support at one time? Pushing more private brands into the young men's and junior assortments seems to be a very risky move.
Report a Concern
More GLG News in
Consumer Goods & Services
Most Popular:
Source Article | Expert Analyses
The JCK-Harrison Group Consumer Jewelry Study
www.jckonline.com
Consumer confidence nears all-time low
money.cnn.com
Starbucks to close 600 stores in the U.S.
www.msnbc.msn.com
A Hot Streak for Retailers
www.forbes.com
STATION CASINOS ANNOUNCES GRAND OPENING OF ALIANTE STATION
www.lasvegassun.com
What will it take?
June 26, 2008
"A Hot Streak for Retailers"....The Heat is on for Surf Brands and Boardsport Retail
June 26, 2008
The Domestic Car Business.....Is Anyone Buying Anything?
June 25, 2008
I'm too sexy for my shirt?
June 25, 2008
Could An Automaker Bankruptcy Happen? Part 2
June 23, 2008

