January 11, 2007
Indian steelmakers risk over-expansion
Indian consumption was just over 30m tonnes of finished steel in 2005. To reach 200m tonnes by 2020 would require a compound growth rate in excess of 13% for a 15-year period. The previous 15 years has seen a compound growth rate of less than 5%.
Chinese consumption compound growth over the last fifteen years was 12%. Have Indian bureaucrats simply looked at the Chinese performance over the last fifteen years and said that we can do the same? If they have, then they could be setting themselves up for a fall.
Analysis:
For steel consumption to grow at 13% or so, GDP would have to grow by around 9-10% per annum, while fixed asset investment would have to grow by 20% plus. Historically, India has been nowhere near those numbers.
Taking a more reasonable long term forecast of 6.5% and steel consumption growth would be 9%, which is still strong. On a compound basis that would take demand in 2020 to around 110m tonnes - the previous forecast.
Why won't India reach the 13% growth level? Manufacturing in India only accounts for around 25% of GDP, compared to 60% in China. Services in India account for 50% and this is not steel-intensive.
Infrastructure investment will be the driving force for steel consumption. It has been rising in India over the last three years, but is now at around 10-15% year-on-year growth - not the 30% plus seen in China. With infrastructure investment subject to bureaucratic delays as well as the complexities of Indian federal versus state politics and the fact that the private sector is responsible for a significant proportion of the investment, the chance of reaching a sustained Chinese growth rate is unlikely, which was primarily state-directed. Could India push through a Three Gorges-type project in the same time? I think not.
I think the 13% compound growth target is overoptimistic. Steelmakers building to this run the risk of creating substantial overcapacity. Based on a very conservative view of planned capacity coming on-stream and steel consumption growth of 9%, India will build a structural excess of steel of more than 10m tonnes in the next five years that it will be seeking to export. That will be in competition with rising Chinese steel exports and continued protectionism in the target markets of the USA and Europe.
In the mid-1990s, the liberalization of the economy triggered economic growth and the entrance of new private-sector players resulted in a wave of debt-financed investments in the steel industry. A global slowdown in steel demand coupled with weakness in the domestic market over 1998-2001 resulted in multiple bankruptcies, some closures and debt restructuring. The industry did not become profitable again until global steel prices rose in 2004. Most of the planned capital investments of $75bn to build new capacity are to be financed with debt and, in my view, the industry is running the real risk of overextension. It is not being helped by overconfident forecasts and assertions from bureaucrats and politicians.
Report a Concern
More GLG News in
Energy & Industrials
BASF Cuts Profit Goal, to Idle Plants as Orders Drop
www.bloomberg.com
YRC to Get Concessions?
tdu.org
Half of dry bulk orders will ‘not be delivered’
www.lloydslist.com
Weekly US rail shipments tumble 9.1 percent
biz.yahoo.com
Amid economic crisis, wind power spins more slowly
features.csmonitor.com
The gale of a credit crisis blows the wind away!
November 26, 2008
The Peaksters are right on theory, perhaps wrong on timing
November 25, 2008
BASF, Dow Chemical, PPG signal arrival of new world financial order
November 24, 2008
Petrochem Giants in Crisis Mode
November 20, 2008
Land Ahoy...The Dawn of Concentrated Solar Power
November 18, 2008

