May 12, 2008
Genes to Determine Insurance Coverage!
Analysis of:
Congress Passes Bill to Bar Bias Based on Genes | www.nytimes.com
This analysis is solely the work of the author. It has not been edited or endorsed by GLG.
Implications: Gene research may be a double edged sword!Will HIPPA apply to genetic testing!
Analysis: What was long thought to be something to simply help medical research & treat medical problems is coming under strict scrutiny. Insurance companies are of the opinion this information can help better price insurance coverage. What may really be the case is that this information may help insurance companies better predict risks not to cover, taking the true concept of risk transfer out of the equation. Another possible attempt at maximizing profits, by minimizing possible exposure. Would this translate into lower insurance rates, one doubts it? The question becomes should the information in this research be held confidential & not required to be disclosed for things like insurance applications. What next, disclosure to employers for possible job opportunities, adoption proceedings, marriage contracts, etc! Congress seems to be taking a solid approach to this type of genetic testing, disclosure should remain confidential. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_Information_Nondiscrimination_Ac The next question is once you find out you have a genetic disposition to an ailment should you be required to disclose it, or is this creating unequal bargaining power allowing some to go out & get insurance on something they already know would not be covered? The true double edged sword!
Analysis: What was long thought to be something to simply help medical research & treat medical problems is coming under strict scrutiny. Insurance companies are of the opinion this information can help better price insurance coverage. What may really be the case is that this information may help insurance companies better predict risks not to cover, taking the true concept of risk transfer out of the equation. Another possible attempt at maximizing profits, by minimizing possible exposure. Would this translate into lower insurance rates, one doubts it? The question becomes should the information in this research be held confidential & not required to be disclosed for things like insurance applications. What next, disclosure to employers for possible job opportunities, adoption proceedings, marriage contracts, etc! Congress seems to be taking a solid approach to this type of genetic testing, disclosure should remain confidential. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_Information_Nondiscrimination_Ac The next question is once you find out you have a genetic disposition to an ailment should you be required to disclose it, or is this creating unequal bargaining power allowing some to go out & get insurance on something they already know would not be covered? The true double edged sword!
Report a Concern
More GLG News in
Legal, Economic & Regulatory Affairs
Most Popular:
Source Article | Expert Analyses
An Admirable Response to the Crisis
maxkapital.wordpress.com
Global warming A changing climate of opinion?
www.economist.com
Environmentalism Sprouts Up on Corporate Boards
online.wsj.com
Court: Relatives Who Assist In Suicide Can Inherit
www.lexisone.com
Capitol Records v. Jammie Thomas
www.eff.org
A Not So Admirable Response
October 7, 2008
A revolutionary, large capacity, fully natural carbon sequestration method
September 30, 2008
The Response Was Necessary, Though it Invited Catastrophes Waiting for the Next Round
September 29, 2008
"Bailout" Response Increases Risk as it Attempts to Reduce it
September 29, 2008
Nail the Facts, Miss the Consequences
September 29, 2008

