April 30, 2008
Generic Biologics Won't Get A Free Ride
Analysis of:
Don't compromise the safety of biotech drugs | www.latimes.com
This analysis is solely the work of the author. It has not been edited or endorsed by GLG.
Implications: Allowing "generic" versions of biotech drugs to market without full safety testing would endanger consumers
Analysis: At a time when Congress is rushing to increase (at least the perception of) drug safety by pressuring the FDA to slow down drug approvals, it is at the same time considering a move that would endanger consumers by allowing some drugs to market without adequate safety testing.
Congress is considering allowing fast-tracking the approval of "generic" or "Follow on biologics" -- biotech drugs that may in fact not be exactly the same as the original medicine.
The reason? Congress fails to understand that biotech drugs are --by their nature-- different from traditional pharmaceutical products. While typical medicines are relatively easy to reproduce in the form of generics, biotech drugs require a much more complicated process. In fact, the trick in making biotech drugs, is the process. And generics can't just copy that process the way thy can "copy" traditional medications.
While Congress is eager to offer ways to help consumers gain access to lower cost drugs (in the form of generics), they must consider the safety implications of fast-tracking follow-on biologics. Have members of Congress forgotten their "safety at all costs" approach? They ought to apply just a drop of their misplaced over-precaution where it belongs -- where it is needed-- and not allow follow-on biologics without proper safety testing.
Analysis: At a time when Congress is rushing to increase (at least the perception of) drug safety by pressuring the FDA to slow down drug approvals, it is at the same time considering a move that would endanger consumers by allowing some drugs to market without adequate safety testing.
Congress is considering allowing fast-tracking the approval of "generic" or "Follow on biologics" -- biotech drugs that may in fact not be exactly the same as the original medicine.
The reason? Congress fails to understand that biotech drugs are --by their nature-- different from traditional pharmaceutical products. While typical medicines are relatively easy to reproduce in the form of generics, biotech drugs require a much more complicated process. In fact, the trick in making biotech drugs, is the process. And generics can't just copy that process the way thy can "copy" traditional medications.
While Congress is eager to offer ways to help consumers gain access to lower cost drugs (in the form of generics), they must consider the safety implications of fast-tracking follow-on biologics. Have members of Congress forgotten their "safety at all costs" approach? They ought to apply just a drop of their misplaced over-precaution where it belongs -- where it is needed-- and not allow follow-on biologics without proper safety testing.
Report a Concern
More GLG News in
Legal, Economic & Regulatory Affairs
Most Popular:
Source Article | Expert Analyses
Iran Responds Obliquely to Nuclear Plan
www.nytimes.com
"Portabilidad supera primera prueba"
ve.invertia.com
Penn National Gaming Cancels Its Sale to Private Equity Firms
www.nytimes.com
(Pakistani) Smuggling Ring May Have Shared Nuke Design With Iran???!!!
www.usatoday.com
Billionaire Epstein jailed for soliciting sex with minors
www.guardian.co.uk
Number Portability Enhances Competition in Mexican Phone Services
July 17, 2008
Perhaps it is not wise to keep your friend's enemies closer!
July 7, 2008
Assumption for the oil market: the nuclear standoff will continue
July 7, 2008
Good News for Penn Gaming -- in the Long Run
July 7, 2008

