Subscribe to Updates in Accounting & Financial Analysis

RSS By Email

RSS By RSS

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Subscribe in Bloglines


The Expertise Imperative and Compliance Technology
Access to a diverse array of specialized expert inputs drives superior decisions in every organizational context: within corporations, by investors and consultancies, and within nonprofits. When decision makers are confident of their decision inputs, they can respond more quickly and creatively to challenges and opportunities.Learn more about GLG's Compliance Framework


This page may include content provided by Council Members, your access to which is subject to the Terms of Use.
Find Out More

December 10, 2007

Financial Analysis - The Ultimate Impact of IFRS

Analysis of: The Economics of IFRS | www.cfo.com
This analysis is solely the work of the author. It has not been edited or endorsed by GLG.
Analysis By:
Robert Kemp, CPA, ProfessorRobert Kemp, CPA
Professor, University of Virginia - CC
Implications: 1.  Countries adopting IFRS are not always adopting the same standards.  If you look closely, the term "as adopted' is being used a lot (e.g., China).  What that means is countries are adopting IFRS in principle, but are differing on interpretation and actual application/practice. 2.  The end result is the need for financial analysts to become more educated and dig deeper into financial statements.  The idea that we will have one set of standards, simplifying analysis, is false.  Analysts must begin to appreciate how each country is "adopting" IFRS.   3.  Accountants must likewise be sensitive to the "as adopted" challenge.  This goes beyond understanding and dealing with different approaches in different countries.  It also deals with investor expectations and the legal structure within and between countries.  Unless accountants grasp changing investor expectations, they will find themselves in a legal nightmare. 

Analysis: The drive for one consistent, comprehendible set of accounting standards is a noble and desirable quest.  However we live in a diverse world with differing cultural norms (e.g., view of wealth, access to legal systems, etc.).  Culture and resulting values ultimately drive things like accounting standards.  We may say we will have a consistent set of standards with IFRS.  However if we look closely, the "as adopted" phrase shows we will still have a lot of inconsistencies and differing approaches.

What this means is that we will always have differing accounting standards as long as we have differing cultures around the world.  As we become more of a global, one culture population, we become more homogeneous in values.  This homogeneity permits us to move to one set of accounting standards.  However we are moving.  We are not there.  Thus countries are adopting IFRS in principle, but are diverging in interpretation and practice (e.g., pensions).

The bottom line is this will not simplify the work of financial analyst or accountants.  For the foreseeable future, analysts must remain dedicated to education.  Also for the foreseeable future, accountants must remain sensitive to the expectations of investors/analysts and the legal systems in which they operate.  What that means is more disclosure by accountants, and more appreciation/sensitivity by analysts.
 


Report a Concern

GLG News: What Experts Think Is Important





Analytics


Generated at 2008-12-04T17:45:17.897