Subscribe to Updates in Accounting & Financial Analysis

RSS By Email

RSS By RSS

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Subscribe in Bloglines


The Expertise Imperative and Compliance Technology
Access to a diverse array of specialized expert inputs drives superior decisions in every organizational context: within corporations, by investors and consultancies, and within nonprofits. When decision makers are confident of their decision inputs, they can respond more quickly and creatively to challenges and opportunities.Learn more about GLG's Compliance Framework


This page may include content provided by Council Members, your access to which is subject to the Terms of Use.
Find Out More

September 15, 2008

Fair Value Accounting - The Good And Bad Of It In The Real World

This analysis is solely the work of the author. It has not been edited or endorsed by GLG.
Analysis By:
Robert Kemp, CPA, ProfessorRobert Kemp, CPA
Professor, University of Virginia - CC
Implications: Fair value accounting, or mark-to-market accounting, is not new.  The debate of how to account for value has been around for decades.  However the implications of fair value accounting, versus historical accounting, are far reaching and often not grasped.  A society needs to be careful in setting accounting standards that may or may not reflect its cultural values.

Analysis: The debate on fair value accounting versus historical cost accounting versus a mix of the two is not new.  In a perfect world, fair value is ideal.  The current move to fair value accounting, away from historical cost accounting, is driven by two forces.  First is the harmonization of international accounting standards (e.g., IFRS).  Second, is better disclosures about the volatility, and thus risk, imbedded in a company's balance sheet (e.g., pensions). 

However we live in a imperfect world, filled with a lot of disharmony and misunderstanding.  The reality is fair value accounting works best where the legal framework of society accepts the subjectivity of market, and thus divergent values (e.g., Europe).  The culture of the United States provides a very open legal system, based on ease of access.  We can see this with contingent fees for lawyers and the high number of lawsuits.  However, coupled with human nature, this may create significant problems when our (US) accounting methodology becomes more subjective with fair value accounting.    Simply, people hate to admit they made a bad investment decision.  People love to blame bad information for losing money.   I am not sure we have grasped the fact that our society, so long dependent on historical cost numbers, is culturally ready to accept more subjective fair value numbers.

The bottom line is, with or without SOX, corporate management and their auditors are in for a rough ride as we transition to fair value accounting.  First, investor expectations need to adjusted.  Second, our legal system needs to adapt.
  

Other Analyses of the Same Source Article:
Is “Fair-Value” Really that Dangerous?
September 10, 2008, Author: Robert McCabe, Ph.D., CPA, CFE, Partner, McCabe & Associates, PhDs

Report a Concern

Analytics


Generated at 2008-11-21T17:45:19.123