Subscribe to Updates in Financial & Business Services

RSS By Email

RSS By RSS

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Subscribe in Bloglines


The Expertise Imperative and Compliance Technology
Access to a diverse array of specialized expert inputs drives superior decisions in every organizational context: within corporations, by investors and consultancies, and within nonprofits. When decision makers are confident of their decision inputs, they can respond more quickly and creatively to challenges and opportunities.Learn more about GLG's Compliance Framework


This page may include content provided by Council Members, your access to which is subject to the Terms of Use.
Find Out More

April 25, 2007

Does the Barclays - ABN Deal Structure Snooker Other Bidders?

Analysis of: Barclays buys ABN for 46 billion pounds | uk.reuters.com
This analysis is solely the work of the author. It has not been edited or endorsed by GLG.
Analysis By:
Bill Bradway, Founder & Managing DirectorBill Bradway
Founder & Managing Director, Bradway Research, LLC
Implications: Barclays' (NYS:BCS) deal to buy ABN AMRO, conditioned on the sale of ABN's LaSalle Bank in the US, for 46 Billion Pounds (67 Billion Euros, $91 Billion) is on the table. The trio of Royal Bank of Scotland, Banco Santander and Fortis (TOR:FOR.TO) are circling ABN trying to figure out how to scotch this deal with a three way split of ABN's various businesses. Complicating this deal is the already announced sale of LaSalle Bank to Bank of America for $21 billion cash (10.5 Billion Pounds). LaSalle was coveted by RBS which would be combined with its Citizens Financial Group in the US. Banco Santander is interested in ABN's Latin American franchise and its Italian bank. Fortis would be after ABN's Dutch franchise.

Analysis: Structuring this deal to require the sale of LaSalle may well snooker the trio of RBS, Santander and Fortis and any other bidders for that matter.

1. By getting a cash price on LaSalle from a strong buyer like B of A, Barclays is assured of getting the parts of ABN that it wants at a fixed price and avoiding the US, where it has a poor operating history.

2. If another bidder steps up with more money for LaSalle, ABN shareholders benefit with no additional cost to Barclays. The current deal structure may force RBS to bid for LaSalle by itself.

3. Other bidders would have to top the Barclays' bid - which is easier said than done. Taking out costs is key to any bid's success. Another bid would likely have to take out more costs than Barclays - which is a tall order. This leaves ING  and perhaps HSBC as possible bidders. But, neither of these firms have paid over the top for their previous acquisitions which were much smaller than ABN.

4. Hostile takeovers in the banking industry are rare. While RBS was successful in a hostile takeover of NatWest, that skirmish was more narrow in scope than ABN's case and the price justification was based on the in-market efficiencies that RBS gained from the deal. ABN offers some in-market efficiencies for the trio, but a higher priced deal may leave each of the three banks wondering if they are overpaying for their piece of the ABN pie.

Other Analyses of the Same Source Article:
Does Barclays, the Consortium, Bank of America Or ABN Shareholders Win In this Deal?
April 25, 2007, Author: Kamala Worthington, VP, Marketing Product Manager, Bank of America Corporation
Royal threat looms over Dream Team
April 25, 2007, Author: Harnath Sithamraju, Consultant, Harnath Sithamraju

Report a Concern

More GLG News in
Financial & Business Services

Most Popular:
Source Article | Expert Analyses
 

GLG News: What Experts Think Is Important





Analytics


Generated at 2008-11-21T05:45:43.110