Subscribe to Updates in Accounting & Financial Analysis

RSS By Email

RSS By RSS

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Subscribe in Bloglines


The Expertise Imperative and Compliance Technology
Access to a diverse array of specialized expert inputs drives superior decisions in every organizational context: within corporations, by investors and consultancies, and within nonprofits. When decision makers are confident of their decision inputs, they can respond more quickly and creatively to challenges and opportunities.




This page may include content provided by Council Members, your access to which is subject to the Terms of Use.
Find Out More

April 28, 2008

Could something be clearly worth zero?

Analysis of: SEC's Atkins Calls for Fair-Value Guidance | www.cfo.com
This analysis is solely the work of the author. It has not been edited or endorsed by GLG.
Analysis By:
Robert McCabe, Ph.D., CPA, CFE, Partner, McCabe & Associates, PhDsRobert McCabe, Ph.D., CPA, CFE 
Partner, McCabe & Associates, PhDs
Implications: How can an SEC Commissioner who is obviously not familiar with Fair Value estimates call for changing the existing guidance? The value of something is zero if that is what you can buy and sell it for.    

Analysis:  According to Commissioner Paul Atkins the SEC needs to issue guidance on how fair value can be estimated for assets when no active market exists.  “Something is clearly not worth zero, “he said.  “Between us and the accounting firms and the investment banks ….we need to come up with some good guidance for people,” he said.  

Perhaps Commissioner Atkins forgot the Financial Accounting Standards Board is still in existence.  He’s also obviously not familiar with the guidance contained in SFAS No 157, Fair Value Measurements. 

The purpose of this article is not to provide an analysis of the standard on estimating fair values.  Instead it is to express my surprise that a SEC Commissioner could be unfamiliar with an accounting standard that he believes should be amended.  

SFAS No. 157 stresses valuation techniques consistent with the market, income and cost approaches to determine fair value. A single valuation technique is appropriate where active markets exist.  In other cases, multiple valuation techniques may be appropriate. “If multiple valuation techniques are used, the reporting entity should evaluate the results (respective indications of fair value), considering the reasonableness of the range indicated by those results. The fair value measurement is the point within that range that is most representative of fair value in the circumstances,” [SFAS 157, par A13].  

Clearly, entities have a great deal of flexibility in coming up with their fair value estimates.  Perhaps what many are objecting to is the requirement to disclose how they estimated the fair value of their assets or liabilities.  

As pointed out above, the cost approach and income approach are available to estimate fair value.  In addition, there several generally accepted financial models available as well.  While Commissioner Atkins may disagree, the value is zero if that is what you can buy and sell it for.  

Other Analyses of the Same Source Article:
Electro-shocking a corpse
May 5, 2008, Author: GLG Expert Contributor

Report a Concern

GLG News: What Experts Think Is Important





Analytics