August 19, 2008
Clean Air Ruling’s Potential Affect on Utilities and IPPs Long SO2 and NOx Allowances
Analysis of:
Clean Air Ruling Raises Doubts Over Investments | www.cattlenetwork.com
This analysis is solely the work of the author. It has not been edited or endorsed by GLG.
Implications: Court’s decision vacating the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) potentially affects utilities or IPPs long the allowances as described in the section that follows.
Analysis: CAIR was to go into affect in 2009 in the Eastern United States to reduce NOx year-round on top of the already-existing seasonal NOx SIP requirement for 5 months a year. In addition, the Eastern United States was to reduce SO2 starting in 2010 by surrendering 2 emissions allowances for every 1 ton of SO2 emissions, compared to the current 1-to-1 surrender rate. The SO2 surrender rate was to be 2.86-to-1 in 2015.
The Court’s July 11, 2008 decision vacated CAIR including the points highlighted in the previous paragraph. As a result, utilities or IPPs that purchased allowances beyond what was allocated to them for free by the EPA for their own emissions requirements or for trading are now facing a potential impairment charge.
The 2009 NOx allowances prior to the Court ruling were trading for approximately $5,000 each. They would be worthless if the year-round NOx requirement was not reinstated by some means. The IPPs’ or utilities’ write-down would be the dollar value of the NOx allowances purchased and held that were no longer need to comply with the vacated CAIR.
A key date is August 25, 2008 which is the deadline for the EPA to appeal the decision to vacate CAIR. Another thing to watch would be Congressional action to pass a bill for the President’s approval during the remaining days before January 1, 2009—the date the reduced NOx emissions levels were to start in the Eastern United States under CAIR.
Analysis: CAIR was to go into affect in 2009 in the Eastern United States to reduce NOx year-round on top of the already-existing seasonal NOx SIP requirement for 5 months a year. In addition, the Eastern United States was to reduce SO2 starting in 2010 by surrendering 2 emissions allowances for every 1 ton of SO2 emissions, compared to the current 1-to-1 surrender rate. The SO2 surrender rate was to be 2.86-to-1 in 2015.
The Court’s July 11, 2008 decision vacated CAIR including the points highlighted in the previous paragraph. As a result, utilities or IPPs that purchased allowances beyond what was allocated to them for free by the EPA for their own emissions requirements or for trading are now facing a potential impairment charge.
The 2009 NOx allowances prior to the Court ruling were trading for approximately $5,000 each. They would be worthless if the year-round NOx requirement was not reinstated by some means. The IPPs’ or utilities’ write-down would be the dollar value of the NOx allowances purchased and held that were no longer need to comply with the vacated CAIR.
A key date is August 25, 2008 which is the deadline for the EPA to appeal the decision to vacate CAIR. Another thing to watch would be Congressional action to pass a bill for the President’s approval during the remaining days before January 1, 2009—the date the reduced NOx emissions levels were to start in the Eastern United States under CAIR.
Report a Concern
More GLG News in
Energy & Industrials
Most Popular:
Source Article | Expert Analyses
BASF Cuts Profit Goal, to Idle Plants as Orders Drop
www.bloomberg.com
YRC to Get Concessions?
tdu.org
Half of dry bulk orders will ‘not be delivered’
www.lloydslist.com
Weekly US rail shipments tumble 9.1 percent
biz.yahoo.com
Amid economic crisis, wind power spins more slowly
features.csmonitor.com
The gale of a credit crisis blows the wind away!
November 26, 2008
The Peaksters are right on theory, perhaps wrong on timing
November 25, 2008
BASF, Dow Chemical, PPG signal arrival of new world financial order
November 24, 2008
Petrochem Giants in Crisis Mode
November 20, 2008
Land Ahoy...The Dawn of Concentrated Solar Power
November 18, 2008

