Subscribe to Updates in Energy & Industrials

RSS By Email

RSS By RSS

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Subscribe in Bloglines


The Expertise Imperative and Compliance Technology
Access to a diverse array of specialized expert inputs drives superior decisions in every organizational context: within corporations, by investors and consultancies, and within nonprofits. When decision makers are confident of their decision inputs, they can respond more quickly and creatively to challenges and opportunities.Learn more about GLG's Compliance Framework


This page may include content provided by Council Members, your access to which is subject to the Terms of Use.
Find Out More

May 24, 2007

Carbon Capture and Sequestration (CCS)

This analysis is solely the work of the author. It has not been edited or endorsed by GLG.
Analysis By:
John Cousins, Managing DirectorJohn Cousins
Managing Director, Interim Energy Management Limited
Implications: The Miller Field has been in production since 1992 and is almost depleted. EOR was added to the field in 1996, using alternating water sweep and gas re-injection. A dedicated pipeline system exists between the Miller platform and Peterhead Power Station with no third party use, and gas re-injection exists on the production platform. If CCS is not viable without subsidy for this project, what chance has CCS of being commercially viable at other sites where infrastructure has to be built and where there will be no revenue stream from EOR? Is it wrong to provide government assistance for CCS on a natural gas project, and would any public funds be better spent assisting CCS on a more carbon intensive coal-fuelled project? Does existing infrastructure assist CCS or does it hinder the project economics?

Analysis:  BP have been working on this project for more than 2 years, and have always said it needed government assistance to be successful. BP's Partners in the Miller Field Shell and ConocoPhillips dropped out of the project many months ago, and Scottish and Southern Energy (SSE) who operate Peterhead Power Station are in Partnership with BP and Rio Tinto joined the consortium earlier in May.

SSE have 2300MW of installed generation plant at Peterhead, but can only despatch 1524MW due to transmission constraints. Why would SSE want to invest in adding 475MW of new generation to the already 775MW of stranded assets.

BP have failed to attract any third party business to the Miller infrastructure, despite other pipeline systems in that region of the North Sea attracting significant additional fields to existing infrastructure. BP now find the Miller infrastructure is empty and will be faced with decommissioning costs if no extra business can be found.

If this CCS project is not viable having considered an extra 57 million barrels of EOR, use of redundant infrastructure and gas re-injection equipment, and delaying decommissioning costs for up to 20 years. Then what are the chances for CCS project where there are far less commercial opportunities?

Other Analyses of the Same Source Article:
Carbon Capture Costs will make the Technology Questionalble
May 28, 2007, Author: GLG Expert Contributor

Report a Concern

GLG News: What Experts Think Is Important





Analytics


Generated at 2008-12-01T09:45:16.773