Subscribe to Updates in Healthcare

RSS By Email

RSS By RSS

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Subscribe in Bloglines


The Expertise Imperative and Compliance Technology
Access to a diverse array of specialized expert inputs drives superior decisions in every organizational context: within corporations, by investors and consultancies, and within nonprofits. When decision makers are confident of their decision inputs, they can respond more quickly and creatively to challenges and opportunities.Learn more about GLG's Compliance Framework


This page may include content provided by Council Members, your access to which is subject to the Terms of Use.
Find Out More

September 4, 2008

CA E-Pedigree Delayed to 2015

Analysis of: Bill to track medicines is praised | www.signonsandiego.com
This analysis is solely the work of the author. It has not been edited or endorsed by GLG.
Analysis By:
Adam Fein, PhD, Founder & PresidentAdam Fein, PhD
Founder & President, Pembroke Consulting Inc
Implications: Implementation of California’s e-pedigree law has (probably) been pushed back to 2015. The widespread industry support for the bill makes me believe that the 2015 date might actually stick. The more realistic timeline should encourage pharmaceutical manufacturers to get serious about mass serialization for their products – a necessary first step for California’s vision of serialized e-pedigree. I expect that “mass serialization” will become increasingly important for supply chain security efforts at multinational drug makers, especially given the new serialization requirements in countries such as Belgium, Italy, and Turkey. The new California legislation also clears the way for a Federal approach to serialized e-pedigree by setting strong federal pre-emption language.

Analysis: The new CA timeline comes from SB1307, a bill sponsored by CA state Senator Mark Ridley-Thomas and passed by the state assembly on August 19 by a vote of 58-1. Technically, the bill still needs to be signed by Governor Schwarzenegger to become law in California.

Here are the new deadlines for compliance:

-- Manufacturers: 50% of product lines serialized by January 1, 2015; 100% by January 1, 2016
-- Wholesalers: January 1, 2016

-- Pharmacies: January 1, 2017


There was extensive lobbying from all sides throughout the summer as everyone raced to meet the end-of-session deadline. Senator Ridley-Thomas described the process in a press release (State Assembly Aproves Ridley-Thomas Measure to Protect Public from Bad Medicine), saying:


“All vested parties, including consumer protection advocates and pharmaceutical manufacturers and distributors have reached resolution and have identified a reasonable and workable solution that will allow additional time and flexibility to comply with current requirements.”


I suggest that you read the official Senate Floor analysis for a good summary of the bill’s evolution. When you get to the bottom, you will be rewarded with a list of the 13 associations and 22 companies that formally supported SB1307. Curiously, only two of the big wholesalers – Cardinal Health (CAH) and McKesson (MCK) – are listed as public supporters.




Report a Concern

GLG News: What Experts Think Is Important





Analytics


Generated at 2008-12-02T17:45:17.163