May 9, 2007
Brokering a deal for HIV drugs is a big win
Analysis of:
Clinton Says 66 Developing Nations To Get Cheaper AIDS Drugs | www.medicalnewstoday.com
This analysis is solely the work of the author. It has not been edited or endorsed by GLG.
Implications:
Analysis: Pharmaceutical companies have long claimed the high price of drugs is due to the need to recoup the cost of years(and millions of dollars) of R&D. Of course, hefty advertising aimed at doctors and directly to patients add to the cost of bringing drugs to market.
In that sort of climate poor patients and poor countries are deprived of vital drugs. Therefore it is very important when deals like these can be brokered. Partnerships such as these brokered by the Clinton Foundation means everyone is happy- the drug companies get market share, patients get crucial drugs they could not otherwise afford. In addition as competition among companies increases, consumers may be the beneficiaries of a lower price break.
It is to be expected that pharmaceutical companies will examine their sales and marketing strategies for other meds as well eg drugs for other chronic diseases like diabetes, CHF, CVD etc. Drug companies will seek out consortiums as much as consortiums seek out companies.
UNITAID and CHAI have demonstrated the wisdom of competitive bidding in a free market.
The fact that this deal was successfully brokered is a victory for HIV patients, poor countries and the free market. As pharmaceutical companies compete to get market share and to win the PR war, they will enter into deals such as these more and more. This is one case in which everyone wins.
Analysis: Pharmaceutical companies have long claimed the high price of drugs is due to the need to recoup the cost of years(and millions of dollars) of R&D. Of course, hefty advertising aimed at doctors and directly to patients add to the cost of bringing drugs to market.
In that sort of climate poor patients and poor countries are deprived of vital drugs. Therefore it is very important when deals like these can be brokered. Partnerships such as these brokered by the Clinton Foundation means everyone is happy- the drug companies get market share, patients get crucial drugs they could not otherwise afford. In addition as competition among companies increases, consumers may be the beneficiaries of a lower price break.
It is to be expected that pharmaceutical companies will examine their sales and marketing strategies for other meds as well eg drugs for other chronic diseases like diabetes, CHF, CVD etc. Drug companies will seek out consortiums as much as consortiums seek out companies.
UNITAID and CHAI have demonstrated the wisdom of competitive bidding in a free market.
Report a Concern
More GLG News in
Healthcare
Most Popular:
Source Article | Expert Analyses
Use of Antipsychotics in Children Is Criticized
www.nytimes.com
Personal medicine is goal of Eli Lilly & Co.
www.azcentral.com
Scientists recommend 'black box' for Avastin
www.fiercepharma.com
Are Costly Diabetes Pills Doing Any Good?
www.pharmalot.com
Use of Antipsychotics in Children Poses Risks of Adverse Effects
November 26, 2008
Avastin and clots? News to me. Black box warning? Why?
November 24, 2008
Off Label Use Can Be Prevented
November 24, 2008
Gardasil will most certainly be approved for boys
November 24, 2008
Medivations's (MDVN) Dimebon - We've Seen This Movie Before
November 24, 2008

