Subscribe to Updates in Legal, Economic & Regulatory Affairs

RSS By Email

RSS By RSS

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Subscribe in Bloglines


The Expertise Imperative and Compliance Technology
Access to a diverse array of specialized expert inputs drives superior decisions in every organizational context: within corporations, by investors and consultancies, and within nonprofits. When decision makers are confident of their decision inputs, they can respond more quickly and creatively to challenges and opportunities.Learn more about GLG's Compliance Framework


This page may include content provided by Council Members, your access to which is subject to the Terms of Use.
Find Out More

October 1, 2007

Asbestos: WR Grace's Lost Criminal Appeal increases its potential exposure

Analysis of: W.R. Grace Loses Appeal In Asbestos Mine Case | www.washingtonpost.com
This analysis is solely the work of the author. It has not been edited or endorsed by GLG.
Analysis By:
Martin Alpert, Claim DirectorMartin Alpert
Claim Director, CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED SERVICES GROUP INC
Implications: WR Grace's Lost criminal appeal may affect timing of emergence from bankruptcy. Lost criminal appeal increases WR Grace's potential exposure.

Analysis: WR Graces's 524(g) bankruptcy emergence may likely be affected by losing its criminal appeal and at the very least their potential for exposure has increased.  WR Grace had a major victory awhile back when the trial court essentially threw out the majority of the conspiracy charges based on the prosecution blowing the statute of limitations.  http://www.missoulian.com/articles/2006/06/14/news/mtregional/news06.txt  In essence, the 3 panel 9th circuit court of appeals found there may simply have been insufficient allegations that the knowing endangerment occurred within the allegedly applicable five year statute of limitations. An error in possible substance over form, but nonetheless detrimental to WR Grace's defense.  Prosecutors will now be able to introduce testimony and evidence that Grace and its officials were on notice regarding the hazards of asbestos since at least 1976. Grace is also now barred from arguing at trial that it had followed national emissions standards covering the release of hazardous materials.  All in all, with their criminal exposure increased the timing of their anticipated emergence from bankruptcy may be delayed. Point counterpoint is that the claimants' may want more time to explore their reorganization plan options and WR Grace may be more receptive to resolution as the pending criminal exposure could have obvious downside to its potential introduction in the class actions if a stay is lifted.  So much for prepackaged bankruptcy being timely!


Report a Concern

GLG News: What Experts Think Is Important





Analytics


Generated at 2008-12-02T21:45:18.640