September 1, 2008
Apple 3G iPhone - Power, ie battery performance dominates handheld performance
Analysis of:
Power-control software blamed for iPhone 3G reception issues | news.cnet.com
This analysis is solely the work of the author. It has not been edited or endorsed by GLG.
Implications: The question posed at the end of the article is key:-
The unanswered question--assuming this account is accurate--is why the
iPhone 3G shipped with balky power-control software, something that
ostensibly could have been discovered in testing?
It is true this could have been discovered, but as of launch we had 1m users using the phone immediately - always a sure way to test the phone and they found the weak spot.
Apple is learning very quickly what it takes to get a world class phone to market in volume across 3 continents and is responding to criticism - part of its marketing image.
This response is ahead of its major competitors.
Analysis: The 3G iPhone is not new in delivering performance, not new in using multiple radios and not new in wanting a sleek design - the latter will always compromise battery life.
3 factors here, adding in a 3G radio, always having a big, bright LCD display and needing high bandwidth (3G or WiFi) to keep the browsing fast. Use them and battery life drops significantly.
Many 3G iphone users, whose network still use 2G for voice [and 3G for data with parallel coverage] are able to side step this issue by turning off 3G and getting half decent response for email using GPRS/EDGE. Browsing will always in this case take longer, the benefit is 1 to 2 days of battery life.
Where does this leave us,
a) Apple is to be commended for responding so quickly
b) battery life is still a critical factor
and for once the attempts by the engineers to manage power control has pushed the optimisation slightly too far in one direction with a subsequent loss in call quality - this latter factor is something mobile operators cannot put up with.
Analysis: The 3G iPhone is not new in delivering performance, not new in using multiple radios and not new in wanting a sleek design - the latter will always compromise battery life.
3 factors here, adding in a 3G radio, always having a big, bright LCD display and needing high bandwidth (3G or WiFi) to keep the browsing fast. Use them and battery life drops significantly.
Many 3G iphone users, whose network still use 2G for voice [and 3G for data with parallel coverage] are able to side step this issue by turning off 3G and getting half decent response for email using GPRS/EDGE. Browsing will always in this case take longer, the benefit is 1 to 2 days of battery life.
Where does this leave us,
a) Apple is to be commended for responding so quickly
b) battery life is still a critical factor
and for once the attempts by the engineers to manage power control has pushed the optimisation slightly too far in one direction with a subsequent loss in call quality - this latter factor is something mobile operators cannot put up with.
Report a Concern
More GLG News in
Technology, Media & Telecom
Most Popular:
Source Article | Expert Analyses
Virtualization's Pain Points
www.forbes.com
Why Apple Should Buy Dell
lowendmac.com
BlackBerry maker battles back
money.cnn.com
No spectrum shortage: DoT
www.business-standard.com
Ciena AT&T News Gives Equipment Provider a Boost
www.washingtonpost.com
Spectrum fragmentation and competition - the Indian misconception
November 27, 2008
What VCs Should Invest In ... In this Economy
November 24, 2008
TV Numbers Are Not That Good
November 21, 2008
TV Numbers Aren't Good - But Don't Rule Out The Power Of The Consumer
November 20, 2008
A Note on Consumer Behaviour with an eye on Experience in Africa
November 20, 2008

