Subscribe to Updates in Energy & Industrials

RSS By Email

RSS By RSS

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Subscribe in Bloglines


The Expertise Imperative and Compliance Technology
Access to a diverse array of specialized expert inputs drives superior decisions in every organizational context: within corporations, by investors and consultancies, and within nonprofits. When decision makers are confident of their decision inputs, they can respond more quickly and creatively to challenges and opportunities.Learn more about GLG's Compliance Framework


This page may include content provided by Council Members, your access to which is subject to the Terms of Use.
Find Out More

May 19, 2008

Activated Carbon Injection for Mercury Control at Coal Plants

Analysis of: Controlling Mercury Emissions | pubs.acs.org
This analysis is solely the work of the author. It has not been edited or endorsed by GLG.
Analysis By:
Thomas Shewski
Owner, High Energy Services
Implications:     The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling on February 8, 2009 in favor of the plaintiffs that coal plants could not be removed from the list of mercury sources subject to a Maximum Available Control Technology (MACT) standard and the subsequent movements to require EPA to set a mercury MACT standard for coal-fired power plants provides an opportunity in the mercury control space, including activated carbon.

Analysis:     Senator Tom Carper (D-DE) introduced on February 14, 2008 S. 2643, “Mercury Emissions Control Act” (MECA).  MECA requires the EPA to set a MACT standard for coal-fired power plants.  The bill calls for MACT to remove at least 90% of mercury that would otherwise be emitted.
 
     Activated carbon injection is one of the leading and proven means to remove mercury from a coal plant’s emissions.  One of the companies in the activated carbon space and planning expansion is Calgon Carbon Corporation.

    As the article stated, a coal plant’s configuration and the type of coal it burns influence the control system’s efficiency.  Likewise, it also affects the amount of activated carbon required to achieve the proposed 90% removal rate.  For planning purpose, new plants with 90% mercury removal require approximately 13 lbs per each 100 MWhr.


Report a Concern

GLG News: What Experts Think Is Important





Analytics


Generated at 2008-10-12T01:47:01.177