January 9, 2007
2007 Q-1 Marks First Quarter Accounting for Uncertain Tax Positions Becomes Effective
Analysis of:
Uncertainty Reigns Over Taxes | www.cfo.com
This analysis is solely the work of the author. It has not been edited or endorsed by GLG.
Implications: FASB Interpretation No. 48 ("FIN 48"), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, becomes effective in a company's first quarter beginning after December 15, 2006 (i.e., the quarter ended 3/31/07 for calendar year companies). Adoption of the new interpretation will have an immediate impact on most companies balance sheets; in some cases, a material impact. Thereafter, earnings will likely be impacted as well. The long-term impact on earnings is still unknown. Companies that are less aggressive from a tax perspective will see less of an impact on earnings; those that have been more aggressive will likely see a greater impact on earnings (i.e., a reduction in earnings). In addition to the balance sheet and statement of earnings impact, companies will also have to provide far more information regarding its tax strategies in its income tax footnote.
Analysis: Uncertain tax positions exist because of certain ambiguities in the tax code. Generally, a taxpayer must only have a "realistic possibility" of prevailing in a tax matter in order to avoid the imposition of penalties. Therefore, taxpayers often take aggressive tax positions in their tax return filings. Some companies are less aggressive and others are more aggressive; this is often driven by management's tolerance for uncertainty and the nature of a company's business activities.
Beginning in 2007, all public companies will have to comply with the provisions of FIN 48. FIN 48 will generally result in the recording of more liabilities for uncertain tax positions than its predecessor, Financial Accounting Standard ("FAS") 5. Initially, companies will be required to increase their liabilities for existing uncertain tax positions with a corresponding adjustment to retained earnings (as of January 1, 2007 for most companies). Thereafter, companies will be required to make adjustments to their liabilities for uncertain tax positions (both increases and decreases) and these adjustments may impact earnings, depending upon the nature of the tax position. Some companies will see an increase in the volatility of the their effective tax rates (ETR) while others will not. Generally, the more aggressive the company (with regard to tax positions), the more volatility it will experience in its ETR.
Not only will some companies experience more volatility in their ETRs, they will also experience an overall increase in their provision for taxes (i.e., income tax expense). This is likely for two reasons: First, companies that have been historically aggressive in their tax positions may decide to become somewhat less aggressive in their tax positions given the new accounting treatment for these positions; Second, the additional footnote disclosures required under FIN 48 may result in taxing authorities (e.g., the IRS) having greater success in detecting aggressive tax strategies.
Though not effective until Q-1 of 2007, SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB") 74 requires companies to disclose the effects of FIN 48 in their 2006 K-1s (available in early March of 2007 for most companies). Therefore, the amount of the additional liability to be recorded in Q-1 of 2007 resulting from the transition from FAS 5 to FIN 48 should be disclosed (i.e., quantified in the tax footnote) in the 2006 K-1s.
Analysis: Uncertain tax positions exist because of certain ambiguities in the tax code. Generally, a taxpayer must only have a "realistic possibility" of prevailing in a tax matter in order to avoid the imposition of penalties. Therefore, taxpayers often take aggressive tax positions in their tax return filings. Some companies are less aggressive and others are more aggressive; this is often driven by management's tolerance for uncertainty and the nature of a company's business activities.
Beginning in 2007, all public companies will have to comply with the provisions of FIN 48. FIN 48 will generally result in the recording of more liabilities for uncertain tax positions than its predecessor, Financial Accounting Standard ("FAS") 5. Initially, companies will be required to increase their liabilities for existing uncertain tax positions with a corresponding adjustment to retained earnings (as of January 1, 2007 for most companies). Thereafter, companies will be required to make adjustments to their liabilities for uncertain tax positions (both increases and decreases) and these adjustments may impact earnings, depending upon the nature of the tax position. Some companies will see an increase in the volatility of the their effective tax rates (ETR) while others will not. Generally, the more aggressive the company (with regard to tax positions), the more volatility it will experience in its ETR.
Not only will some companies experience more volatility in their ETRs, they will also experience an overall increase in their provision for taxes (i.e., income tax expense). This is likely for two reasons: First, companies that have been historically aggressive in their tax positions may decide to become somewhat less aggressive in their tax positions given the new accounting treatment for these positions; Second, the additional footnote disclosures required under FIN 48 may result in taxing authorities (e.g., the IRS) having greater success in detecting aggressive tax strategies.
Though not effective until Q-1 of 2007, SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB") 74 requires companies to disclose the effects of FIN 48 in their 2006 K-1s (available in early March of 2007 for most companies). Therefore, the amount of the additional liability to be recorded in Q-1 of 2007 resulting from the transition from FAS 5 to FIN 48 should be disclosed (i.e., quantified in the tax footnote) in the 2006 K-1s.
Report a Concern
More GLG News in
Accounting & Financial Analysis
Most Popular:
Source Article | Expert Analyses
Could Bank Rules Break The Fair Value Debate
www.cfo.com
Derivatives:Giving Credit Where It is Due
www.economist.com
Centrica secures LNG cargo from Qatar
www.ogj.com
SFAS Exposure Draft On Going Concern
www.fasb.org
The Future of Fair Value Accounting and Mark to Market (FASB 157)
November 19, 2008
The Changing Effects of Economic and Political Consequences on Accounting Rules - The Fair Value Debate
November 14, 2008
LNG - The Cross Border, Global Arbitrage Opportunity?
November 10, 2008
The Global Financial System - Required and Expected Changes - A Look at Expectations
November 10, 2008

