
Principal Analyst, Insight 64
Member of the Technology Council
Nathan Brookwood is Principal Analyst at Insight 64, a semiconductor consulting firm. He has worked for and with suppliers of mainframes, minicomputers, personal computers and semiconductors and has analyzed and commented on the industry from perches at D.H. Brown Associates and Dataquest. Although best known for his knowledge of the semiconductor industry, he also works in closely allied system markets where semiconductor technology plays a key role. At Insight 64 and Gartner Dataquest, he focused on microprocessors used in computational applications. His views on the microprocessor market often find their way into articles in mainstream media, business media and the trade press. During his thirty year career in the industry, he held marketing management positions at Micronics, a PC component supplier, Intergraph's Advanced Processor Division, Convergent Technologies and Prime Computer, and he held marketing and development management positions at Digital Equipment Co. (This is me - Update Profile)
Opinions and analyses expressed in GLG News are solely those of the author. See the Terms of Use for details.
Even 2-D Users Will Miss Nvidia's Integrated 3-D Graphics on Core i3/i5 Systems
October 8, 2009
Nvidia Escalates Feud With Intel | online.wsj.com
Nvidia's chipsets outperform Intel's when it comes to integrated 3-D graphics, but Intel's move to incorporate graphics into its Core i3/i5 CPUs leaves no room for Nvidia's integrated solution. Too bad! Windows 7's DirectCompute feature speeds up media operations on systems with AMD or Nvidia discrete or integrated GPUs, but won't work with Intel's integrated graphics. Even users who don't care about 3-D may notice this media deceleration on Core i3/i5 systems that lack discrete GPUs.
Fermi versus AMD Radeon: Who Wins, Who Loses in Supercomputing Applications?
October 4, 2009
Supercomputer to use new Nvidia 'Fermi' chip | news.cnet.com
While AMD and Nvidia battle for supremacy in the GPU computing arena, there's one obvious loser, Intel. AMD's 5870 appeared on schedule. Nvidia's Fermi is late, but its GTX 280 series still is competitive. Intel's Larrabee remains a no-show. End users who buy their systems by the teraflop have discovered and validated an alternative approach that requires fewer x86 CPUs, less power, and less space. GPU computing is here to stay, and the market will punish those who lack a competitive offering.
Intel’s 45nm Penryn: Cool Process but Ho-Hum Processor
November 13, 2007
Intel Ships Power-Efficient Penryn CPUs | www.pcworld.com
Intel's turned its PR apparatus on high today, trumpeting the launch of its first 45nm processors, code-named Penryn. The company can certainly claim credit as the first CPU vendor to ship 45nm products, but the products it launched now are merely warmed over versions of the mature 65nm designs it introduced last year. The good news is that these chips work in the same desktop, notebook and server platforms as the models they replace. This simplifies the qualification process for OEM system suppliers and end users. The bad news is that the new process improves the new chips' performance by ten to fifteen percent on average -- hardly anything to get excited about. We don't expect these new chips to have much impact on the competitive positions of Intel and AMD, but the new chips are roughly 30 percent smaller than the ones they replace, and thus will indirectly increase Intel's production capacity by about a third. This explains why Intel recently trimmed its CAPEX forecast.
April 27, 2006
Intel Plans Enterprise Platform Brand | www.reed-electronics.com
Intel recently launched vPro™, its new brand for business-oriented desktop PCs. The company hopes that vPro will do for its desktop PC business what the Centrino brand did for notebooks in 2003. Centrino introduced the mobile lifestyle for notebook computer users, something users could not do prior to its introduction. Viiv and Vpro just allow users to do what they already are doing, merely with less hassle than before. This seems to me like a fairly weak proposition.
April 27, 2006
Sun Set on McNealy | www.forbes.com
Ever since the dot.com bubble burst, stories about Sun Microsystems usually have contained the word "troubled" somewhere in their text. Wall Street analysts have been open in their contempt for CEO Scott McNealy's strategy of prioritizing R&D headcount above operating profit, but have failed to notice that all that R&D spending has finally resulted in a revamped product line and a more competitive Sun. Although the company turned in another loss for the March quarter, it reported significant growth (YoY) in its core server businesses. Rumors of Sun's death have been greatly exaggerated, but nobody was going to pay attention as long as McNealy remained at the helm. By stepping aside, Scott allows investors to refocus on the company's fundamentals, which I believe are in much better shape than most outsiders realize.
| Study Group Name | No. Members |
|---|---|
| TMT Council Members in Member Programs | 16437 |
| Technology Council Members in Member Programs | 8640 |
| Experts in the Leisure & Lodging Council | 4887 |
| Experts in the Automotive Council | 3422 |
| Semiconductor & Component Experts | 676 |
November 12, 2008 | New York
GLG Seminar: (NYC) Colliding Technologies on the Computing Landscape-Intel, AMD, and NvidiaNovember 11, 2008 | Boston
GLG Seminar: (BOS) Colliding Technologies on the Computing Landscape - Intel, AMD, and NvidiaNovember 4, 2008 | San Francisco
GLG Seminar: (SF) Colliding Technologies on the Computing Landscape - Intel, AMD, and NvidiaAugust 6, 2008 | New York
GLG Seminar: (NYC) Intel vs. AMD vs. NVIDIAAugust 5, 2008 | Boston
GLG Seminar: (BOS) Intel vs. AMD vs. NVIDIA